Purpose
To examine the impact of surgical Intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction on visual function using various methods to define visual field (VF) progression.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was conducted on consecutive glaucoma patients who underwent surgical IOP reduction between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2007. All subjects had glaucomatous optic neuropathy, a minimum of 5 preoperative and 5 postoperative visual fields, and were followed for a minimum of 2 years both before and after surgery. VF progression was determined using Guided Progression Analysis (GPA), linear regression analysis of the visual-field index (VFI), and individual sensitivity values using Progressor™ software.
Results
Seventeen eyes of 17 patients (mean age 77.9 ± 9.9 years) were enrolled. Subjects were followed for a mean 5.8 ± 2.4 years prior to surgery and 4.5 ± 1.5 years following surgery. Mean postoperative IOP (11.3 ± 4.2mmHg) and medications (1.3 ± 1.3) were significantly (p<0.001 and p=0.01) reduced compared with prior to surgery (18.0 ± 3.9mmHg, 2.4 ± 0.9 respectively). The number of eyes judged to have VF progression using any method during the postoperative period (3 of 17, 17.6%) was significantly (p=0.03) reduced compared to the preoperative period (9 of 17 eyes, 52.9%). Using VFI criteria, 8 eyes were judged to have preoperative VF progression and 1 eye had persistent VF progression during the postoperative period. None of the eyes judged to have preoperative VF progression using EMGT (n=4) and Progressor criteria (n=1) demonstrated persistent VF progression during the postoperative period. Among eyes with preoperative VF progression, the postoperative slope of mean deviation (−0.21 ± 0.23 db/yr) was significantly (p=0.03) reduced compared with prior to surgery (−1.01 ± 0.23 db/yr).
Conclusions
Despite differences in the criteria used to define visual field progression, glaucoma surgical IOP reduction significantly reduces the incidence and rate of visual field progression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.