Increasing evidence suggests the possibility of relevant molecular differences between cancers from different ethnic groups. This study uses gene expression profiling by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to identify "intrinsic" subtypes in a Saudi population of breast cancers and compares the distribution of subtypes to the more commonly profiled Caucasian population. In addition, the immunohistochemical profile of breast cancers was correlated to the gene expression analysis. Discrepancy rate of 39% in subtype prediction between gene expression and immunohistochemical profile of the tumors was noticed. Most of this variation was in the luminal subtype. Frequency of HER2+ subtype in the Saudi cases was high (28%) by both the immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the qRT-PCR classification. Triple-negative tumors comprised 39% while only 11% showed a basal-like profile. Analysis of larger cohort of patients is needed to determine the molecular taxonomy of breast cancer in the Saudi population and the benefits from the diagnostic classification developed in the West.

No abstract

Case series Patients: Female, 64-year-old • Female, 74-year-old • Female, 49-year-old Final Diagnosis: Breast adenomyoepithelioma Symptoms: Breast tumor Medication: — Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Oncology • Pathology • Radiology • Surgery Objective: Rare disease Background: Breast adenomyoepithelioma is a rare benign breast tumor characterized by a biphasic proliferation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells with variable clinical and diagnostic features. Establishing the diagnosis, determining optimal therapy, and predicting outcome are problematic because of the rarity of this entity. There have been only 2 large series of adenomyoepitheliomas of the breast, reported by Tavassoli and Rosen, which included 27 and 18 patients, respectively. In this report, we present 3 cases of breast adenomyoepithelioma. Case Reports: Herein, we report 3 cases of breast adenomyoepithelioma. The first case is of a 64-year-old woman who was found to have right breast microcalcification on a screening mammogram. The second case is of a 74-year-old woman who had a right breast mass. These 2 patients were managed by wide local excision. Postoperative microscopic examination revealed adenomyoepithelioma. The third case is of a 49-year-old woman with bilateral saline breast implants who presented with a left breast mass. A core needle biopsy was done and revealed adenomyoepithelioma associated with usual ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. Conclusions: Breast adenomyoepithelioma is a rare condition that can pose diagnostic challenges due to variable imaging presentations, necessitating percutaneous core biopsy for initial diagnosis. Correct diagnosis is usually possible only on excisional biopsy and confirmed by demonstrating the biphasic nature of the tumor by IHC. Clinical suspicion coupled with utilizing both radiological and histopathological facilities can aid in the accurate diagnosis and management. For the most part, they are considered to be benign, but they can locally recur.