No abstract

Accessible summary Despite increasing focus on researching users' experiences of mental health provision, there are few studies which report adolescents and parents' experiences of attending child and adolescent mental health clinics in Ireland. We found that a lack of information and availability of services made it difficult for participants to access help. They want to be included in information sharing and decision making, but adolescents in particular felt that their voices were not heard in the decision‐making process. Frequent staff changes were particularly difficult for adolescents as they need consistent relationship with a key professional to build trust and disclose thoughts and feelings. Provision of flexible consultations (both single and shared), with sensitivity to the differing perspective of adolescents and parents, coupled with inclusion in information sharing and decision making would significantly improve the experience for adolescents and parents. Abstract Service user involvement is essential for quality care in the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). This study was conducted to explore adolescents' and parents' experiences of CAMHS in relation to accessibility, approachability and appropriateness. This study used a descriptive qualitative design, and focus groups and single interviews were conducted with adolescents (n = 15) and parents (n = 32) from three mental health clinics. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Accessing mental health services was a challenging experience for many parents and adolescents due to knowledge deficit, lack of information and limited availability of specialist services. Some parents and adolescents reported positive experiences while others reported negative experiences. They expressed a need for more information, involvement in decision making, flexible scheduling of appointments, school support and parent support groups. The nature and quality of the relationship with staff was critical to positive experience with the service; therefore, frequent changes of medical staff was disruptive. Mental health nurses can play a vital role in ensuring continuity, assessing adolescents' participation preferences and advocating for their information needs with other members of the interdisciplinary team.

Background Due to the complex nature of healthcare professionals’ roles and responsibilities, the education of this workforce is multifaceted and challenging. It relies on various sources of learning from teachers, peers, patients and may focus on Work Integrated Learning (WIL). The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted many of these learning opportunities especially those in large groups or involving in person interaction with peers and patients. Much of the curriculum has been adapted to an online format, the long-term consequence of which is yet to be recognized. The changed format is likely to impact learning pedagogy effecting both students and teachers. This requires a systematic approach to evaluation of online teaching and learning adaptation, in comparison to the previous format, where, in person education may have been the focus. Methods The proposed study is a broad based evaluation of health professional education in a major Australian University. The protocol describes a mixed methods convergent design to evaluate the impact of online education on students and teachers in health professional courses including Medicine, Nursing, Allied Health and Biomedical Science. A framework, developed at the university, using Contribution Analysis (CA), will guide the evaluation. Quantitative data relating to student performance, student evaluation of units, quantity of teaching activities and resource utilization will be collected and subjected to relevant statistical analysis. Data will be collected through surveys (500 students and 100 teachers), focus groups (10 groups of students) and interviews of students and teachers (50 students beyond graduation and 25 teachers, for long term follow up to 12 months). Application of CA will be used to answer the key research questions on the short term and long-term impact of online education on teaching and learning approaches. Discussion The protocol describes the study, which will be widely implemented over the various courses in Health Professional Education and Biomedical Science. It will evaluate how students and teachers engage with the online delivery of the curriculum, student performance, and resources used to implement these changes. It also aims to evaluate longitudinal outcome of student learning attributes and impact on graduate outcomes, which is poorly reported in educational literature.

No abstract

Introduction Uncertainty tolerance (UT) describes how individuals respond to stimuli of uncertainty, with low UT among medical doctors and students linked to negative outcomes such as burnout. UT research in medical education has focused on measuring the construct, with little research seeking to understand how medical students experience uncertainty. Hence, knowledge on how education may shape students' UT development is lacking. As a first step to understanding students' UT, we asked ‘How do medical students, in their clinical years, experience uncertainty stimuli?’ Methods Utilising a social constructionist approach, we undertook a qualitative study with 41 clinical years medical students. Data were collected during the 2020 academic year employing in‐semester reflective diary entries (n = 230 entries), and semi‐structured interviews at the end of semesters (n = 40 interviews). Data were analysed by framework analysis. Results Students described three major themes of uncertainty stimuli: (i) educational uncertainty, (ii) professional uncertainty and (iii) clinical uncertainty. Educational uncertainty was the dominant stimulus described by students and represents unknowns related to what students needed to learn and how to learn within the context of clinical placements. Professional uncertainty encompassed questions about who students are as developing professionals and who they would be as doctors. Clinical uncertainty was the least represented stimulus and concerned aspects of patient care where the body of medical knowledge is unable to provide clear answers. Conclusions Our findings indicate that clinical learners experience wide reaching uncertainties and suggest that students' stimuli may differ from those of clinicians with more established knowledge and careers. This work now paves the way forward in developing educational interventions to foster UT, such as modifying uncertainties not integral to learning, and purposefully introducing clinical uncertainties relevant to students' learning stage.