Introduction Bariatric surgery has become one of the most rapidly growing subspecialty performed globally, and it has been well reported to be associated with low morbidity and mortality rates. Splenic abscess is a rare but serious complication of bariatric surgery that has not been previously systematically reviewed in the literature. Methods The authors have performed a systematic review of the evidence that has looked into the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and the management options of splenic abscess complicating bariatric surgery. Results This systematic review has been unsurprisingly based on level-IV evidence due to the rarity of the explored condition. The final analysis included 27 relevant reported cases. The mean age was 38 years and the mean of the time interval between the initial operation and developing splenic abscess was 72 days, with the male to female ratio being 1:1.6. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was the initial operation in 85.2% of the patients. Nearly half of the patients did not have an objective evidence of local or systemic sepsis that could explain the abscess formation. Nonsurgical management was attempted in 14 patients, with 34% success rate only. Splenectomy was needed in 41.7% of the patients. No mortality was reported. Conclusions Splenic abscess is a rare and rather late but serious complication of bariatric surgery that could result in splenectomy in a relatively young group of patients. It is more commonly reported following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Early diagnosis with intervention in a timely manner is crucial to avoid life threatening complications.

Introduction Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, surgeons were advised to use conservative management/open surgery for appendicitis. This single-centre study has explored the resulted management differences. Method Retrospective study covering Prepandemic-data over March-May,2019 & Pandemic-data over March-May,2020. Results Prepandemic-(43 patients): Mean age was 38.3 years. Mean length-of-stay was 1.7 days. Preoperative imaging was used in 32(74.4%) patients; this was diagnostic in 28(87.5%). Non-surgical management was used in 4(9.3%) patients; one needed surgery eventually. Surgical approaches in 40 patients were (laparoscopic: 38(95%), open: 2(5%)). Neither significant morbidity nor mortality was reported. Pandemic-(35 patients): Mean age was 31.2 years. Mean length-of-stay was 2.2 days. Preoperative imaging was used in 30(85.7%) patients; this was diagnostic in 26(86.6%). Non-surgical management was used in 8(22.9%) patients; one needed surgery eventually. Surgical approaches in 28 patients were (laparoscopic: 10(35.7%), open: 18(64.3%)). Neither significant morbidity nor mortality was reported, apart from one patient with COVID-19 postoperative infection. Conclusions There was a tendency towards conservative approach/open surgery during the pandemic. Though this was statistically significant (p < 0.05), the total number of patients was small to achieve stronger conclusions. Laparoscopy was selectively used during the pandemic where the benefit outweighed the risks.

Introduction COVID 19 affected surgical training owing to changes in rotations, moving trusts/departments, surgical skills acquisition and new guidelines/protocols during unprecedented times. Aim was to infer how redeployment impacted surgical skills via an objective and subjective study. Method A retrospective observational study comparing lead surgeons in Laparotomy and Appendectomies between 23rd March- 31st July (2019/2020). A subjective survey was done to elucidate perspectives on skill, academic advancement and trust/deanery support. A focussed group discussion was also done to gain insight on physical and psychological well-being. Results Laparotomy 2019 (n = 75) had 59%; 41%; 0% - Consultants/Registrars/ fellows respectively as lead surgeons. 2020 Laparotomies (n = 50) had 40% consultants; 41% registrars; 20% fellows Similarly, Appendectomy 2019 (n = 94) had 8.5% consultants; 71.3% registrars; 3.2% clinical fellows, whereas 2020 Appendectomies (n = 67) had 18% consultants; 71.6% registrars and 10.4% fellows. The Likert questionnaire showed 42.86% had mental exhaustion, less confidence/skills due to lesser opportunities/procedures. 57.14% expressed COVID 19 extremely affected surgical training while 28.14% believed in a reduction of 81-100% operative log book entries from before. Conclusions Although, the results were not significant in number of cases managed by trainees; many reported perceived loss of training( log book/portfolio), less teaching/training opportunities and mental exhaustion.

Introduction COVID-19 pandemic has posed a major challenge to healthcare systems globally. In NHS, around 36,000 cancer operations have been estimated to be cancelled during the peak time alone. This regional study evaluated the risk of COVID-19 in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer during the peak time. Method This prospective multicentre observational study conducted in four busy district hospitals included 52 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgery during the COVID lockdown period (23rd March to 5th May). PCR swab testing was used to detect COVID. Data was collected from patient notes, MDT files and pathology results. Results 73% (38/52) underwent elective procedures, 90% with curative intent. Overall, mean (SD) age was 70 (12.2) years, 50% were female. 60% (32/52) had left sided cancers and a total of 48% (25/52) patients had stage 3 or above. 27% (14/52) had post-operative complications, with 4% (2/52) being Grade 3 Clavien-Dindo. Total mortality was 6% (3/52) of which 1 was elective patient. Only one patient developed COVID infection during the inpatient stay. Conclusions Data suggests, local policies to prevent COVID spread have been effective. Local lockdown in case of second peak may be a reasonable option. Improvement in COVID testing could have major impact on outcomes.

Introduction: Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, the royal college of surgeons advised to use Non-Operative Treatment of appendicitis NOTA or otherwise open surgery for appendicitis. This study has explored the resulted management differences, and the outcome after one year follow up. Methods: Retrospective study covering Pre-pandemic data over March-May,2019 & COVID-19 pandemic data over March-May,2020. We compared the outcome of non-operative treatment approach (NOTA), open and laparoscopic surgical outcome between the 2 groups. Results: The number of admissions was lower in the COVID compared to the Pre-COVID Group (35 vs 43). In the COVID group had more CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis (65.7% vs 42.2%; p=0.036). There was no difference in the diagnostic value for these imaging methods between the 2 groups (87.5% vs 86.6%) During COVID period Signicantly fewer patients underwent surgery (77.1 vs 92.8; p<0.04), There were signicantly more complicated appendicitis cases in the COVID group compared to Pre-COVID group (59.2 vs 28.2; p:0.021). There was in reduction LOS when comparing Laparoscopic to NOTA (1.7 vs 2.6 days; p:0.03). There has been higher complication rate in the open and NOTA treatments compared to Laparoscopic, but this was not statistically signicant (24.3 % vs 14.8%; p: 0.29). In the NOTA group 41 % of the patients had emergency or interval appendectomy in after one year follow up period. Conclusions: There was a tendency towards conservative approach/open surgery during the pandemic. Our study suggests that Laparoscopic surgery should remain the preferred method of management of appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic considering the more complicated appendicitis. NOTA should be limited to selected high risk patients. accepting the risk of disease recurrence and need for further interval or emergency surgery