The standard procedure adopted up to the present in proteome analysis calls for just reduction prior to the isoelectric focusing/immobilized pH gradient (IEF/IPG) step, followed by a second reduction/alkylation step in between the first and second dimension, in preparation for the sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) step. This protocol is far from being optimal. It is here demonstrated, by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF)-mass spectrometry, that failure to reduce and alkylate proteins prior to any electrophoretic step (including the first dimension) results in a large number of spurious spots in the alkaline pH region, due to "scrambled" disulfide bridges among like and unlike chains. This series of artefactual spots comprises not only dimers, but an impressive series of oligomers (up to nonamers) in the case of simple polypeptides such as the human alpha- and beta-globin chains, which possess only one (alpha-) or two (beta-) -SH groups. As a result, misplaced spots are to be found in the resulting two-dimensional (2-D) map, if performed with the wrong protocol. The number of such artefactual spots can be impressively large. In the case of analysis of complex samples, such as human plasma, it is additionally shown that failure to alkylate proteins results in a substantial loss of spots in the alkaline gel region, possibly due to the fact that these proteins, at their pI, regenerate their disulfide bridges with concomitant formation of macroaggregates which become entangled with and trapped within the polyacrylamide gel fibers. This strongly quenches their transfer in the subsequent SDS-PAGE step.

Over the last 3 years, a number of mass spectrometry-based methods for the simultaneous identification and quantification of individual proteins within complex mixtures have been reported. Most, if not all, of such strategies apply a two-step approach: the first for the separation of proteins or peptides, and the second uses mass spectrometry to identify and quantify the individual components. To simplify the outcome of both steps, certain chemicals and heavy-isotope-labeling are commonly used in the early stages of sample preparation (except in differential fluorescence labeling protocols). The ultimate goal of these strategies is to be able to identify every protein expressed in a cell or tissue, and to determine each protein's abundance, state of modification, and possible involvement in multi-protein complexes. In this review, an attempt is made to highlight the salient characteristics of the existing strategies with particular attention to their strengths and weaknesses.

The present review attempts to cover the vast array of methods which have appeared in the last few years for performing quantitative proteome analysis. These methods are divided into two classes: those applicable to conventional two-dimensional map analysis, coupling orthogonally a charge-based step (isoelectric focusing) to a size-based separation [sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS)-electrophoresis] and those applicable to two-dimensional chromatographic protocols. The first method, although being by and large the most popular approach, can offer differential display of paired samples with relatively few methods, the oldest one being based on statistical analysis performed on sets of gels via powerful software packages, such as the MELANIE, PDQuest, Z3 and Z4000, Phoretix and Progenesis. Recent developments comprise analysis performed on a single gel containing mixed samples differentially labeled, either with fluorophors (Cy3 and Cy5) or with d(0)/d(3) acrylamide. Conversely, chromatographic approaches, which mostly rely on analysis not of intact proteins but of their tryptic digests, offer a panoply of differential labeling protocols, most of which rely on stable isotope tagging. Essentially, all possible reactions have been described, such as those involving Lys, Asp, Glu, Cys residues, as well as a number of methods exploiting differential derivatization of amine and carboxyl groups generated during proteolysis. All such methods are described and evaluated.

All existing protocols for protein separation by two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis require the full reduction, denaturation, and alkylation as a precondition for an efficient and meaningful separation of such proteins. Existing literature provides a strong evidence to suggest that full reduction and denaturation can be achieved in a relatively short time; the same thing, however, can not be said for the alkylation process, which the present study shows that more than 6 h are required for a complete alkylation. We have used matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight-mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) to monitor protein alkylation by iodoacetamide over the period 0-24 h at pH 9. The present, fast and specific MS method provided clear indication on the extent and speed of alkylation which reached approximately 70% in the first 2 min, yet the remaining 30% resisted complete alkylation up to 6 h. The use of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) during the alkylation step resulted in a strong quenching of this reaction, whereas 2% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) exerted a much reduced inhibition. The implications of the present measurements on 2-D gel analysis in particular and proteomics in general are discussed.

No abstract