Integrated seismic reservoir characterization of carbonate rocks potentially thwarts difficulties arising from reservoir heterogeneity owed to a complex geological history. The featured interdisciplinary workflow reconciles geological, geophysical and engineering components to address reservoir complexity in terms of stratigraphic architecture coupled with a distribution of layer properties that honors flow zonation. Primarily, this workflow calls for a combination of hydraulic flow unit definition embedded in sequence stratigraphy and is further augmented by seismic attribute analysis (i.e., seismic inversion, frequency decomposition of amplitude, etc.), rock physics, and geostatistical techniques to characterize an UAE onshore oil reservoir located within a Lower Cretaceous carbonate sequence (i.e., lower member of Shu'aiba Formation; Strohmenger et al., 2010). Our results to-date encourage us to further characterize the reservoir applying geostatistical techniques (seismic stochastic inversion, fuzzy math) in a future companion paper.

Brownfields are typically characterized by enormous amounts of data that include various technologies and disciplines enabling highly detailed and probabilistic models. However, data abundance often puts a threat to evaluation effectivity and to a correct identification of key controlling factors. In the E&P industry, many "sequential" approaches exist for mature field evaluation, where "static" and "dynamic" data are disconnected during the process. The main objective of this paper is to present a new and fully integrated workflow for brownfield re-evaluation and rejuvenation. Our "reversed" Geo-Dynamic Field Modelling (GDFM) relies on simultaneous cross-discipline interaction to guarantee data consistency and is based on a full dynamic/static data coupling at a very early stage. The GDFM workflow reverses key elements of the discipline driven sequential workflow. Production and pressure data analysis comes first, not last. Field diagnosis, identification of flow units, well test re-analysis, petrophysical and geological re-interpretation are combined in cross-disciplines model constraints. These include identification of major field issues, data reliability rankings, uncertainty/certainty and impact analysis, parameter trends etc. Seismic (re−) interpretation acts as the first main integration step, honoring all available data already during horizon and fault mapping. This directly ensures a fully integrated model that – combined with seismic attribute analysis - forms the basis for static reservoir modelling and dynamic simulation. A field example illustrates the benefits of the GDFM: a consistent history match at considerably reduced iteration time while focusing on the key controlling factors. GDFM increases model accuracy and confidence because all data sources are incorporated, honored and cross-discplinary quality controlled early in the process. The applied workflow supports uncertainty/certainty analysis for history matching, enhances the geologic model, improves the reservoir properties distributions and presents a solid base for the dynamic simulation. Though a number of minor iterations between the main work packages are still required, the case study shows that full cycle repetitions between static and dynamic modelling are avoided, which considerably reduces the time requirements of the subsurface re-evaluation and improves remarkably the studiy results.