BackgroundThis study aimed at (1) deriving Bayesian methods to predict breeding values for ratio (i.e. feed conversion ratio; FCR) or linear (i.e. residual feed intake; RFI) traits; (2) estimating genetic parameters for average daily feed consumption (ADFI), average daily weight gain (ADG), lean meat percentage (LMP) along with the derived traits of RFI and FCR; and (3) deriving Bayesian estimates of direct and correlated responses to selection on RFI, FCR, ADG, ADFI, and LMP. Response to selection was defined as the difference in additive genetic mean of the selected top individuals, expected to be parents of the next generation, and the total population after integrating genetic trends out of the posterior distribution of selection responses. Inferences were based on marginal posterior distributions obtained from the Bayesian method for integration over unknown population parameters and “fixed” environmental effects and for appropriate handling of ratio traits. Terminal line pigs (n = 3724) were used for a multi-variate model for ADFI, ADG, and LMP. RFI was estimated from the conditional distribution of ADFI given ADG and LMP, using either genetic (RFIG) or phenotypic (RFIP) partial regression coefficients. The posterior distribution of the FCR’s breeding values was derived from the posterior distribution of “fixed” environmental effects and additive genetic effects on ADFI and ADG.ResultsPosterior means of heritability were 0.32, 0.26, 0.56, 0.20, and 0.15 for ADFI, ADG, LMP, RFIP, and RFIG, respectively. Selection against RFIG showed a direct response of − 0.16 kg/d and correlated responses of − 0.16 kg/kg for FCR and − 0.15 kg/d for ADFI, with no effect on other production traits. Selection against FCR resulted in a direct response of − 0.17 kg/kg and correlated responses of − 0.14 kg/d for RFIG, − 0.18 kg/d for ADFI, and 0.98% for LMP.ConclusionsThe Bayesian methodology developed here enables prediction of breeding values for FCR and RFI from a single multi-variate model. In addition, we derived posterior distributions of direct and correlated responses to selection. Genetic parameter estimates indicated a genetic basis for the studied traits and that genetic improvement through selection was possible. Direct selection against FCR or RFIP resulted in unexpected responses in production traits.

The objectives of this study were to determine nitrogen loss at different stages of growth and during the entire growing period and to investigate the associations between nitrogen excretion and production traits in growing pigs. Data from 315 pigs of an F(2) population which originated from crossing Pietrain sires with a commercial dam line were used. Nitrogen retention was derived from protein retention as measured using the deuterium dilution technique during different stages of growth (60 to 90 kg, 90 to 120 kg, and 120 to 140 kg). Pigs were fed ad libitum with 2 pelleted diets containing 17% (60 to 90 kg) and 16.5% (90 to 120 and 120 to 140 kg) CP. Average daily nitrogen excretion (ADNE) within each stage of growth was calculated on the basis of the accumulated difference between average daily nitrogen intake (ADNI) and average daily nitrogen retention (ADNR). Least ADNE, nitrogen excretion per BW gain (NEWG) and total nitrogen excretion (TNE) were observed during growth from 60 to 90 kg. In contrast, the greatest ADNE, NEWG, and TNE were found during growth from 120 to 140 kg. Statistical analyses indicated that gender, housing type, the ryanodine receptor 1 (RYR1) gene, and batch influenced nitrogen excretion (P < 0.05), but the degree and direction of influences differed between growth stages. Gender differences showed that gilts excreted less nitrogen than barrows (P < 0.05), which was associated with decreased feed conversion ratio (FCR; feed:gain) and lipid:protein gain ratio. Single-housed pigs showed reduced nitrogen excretion compared with group-housed pigs (P < 0.05). In comparison to other genotypes, pigs carrying genotype NN (homozygous normal) at the RYR1 locus had the least nitrogen excretion (P < 0.05) at all stages of growth except from 60 to 90 kg. The residual correlations indicated that NEWG and TNE have large positive correlations with FCR (r = 0.99 and 0.91, respectively) and moderate negative correlations with ADG (r = -0.53 and -0.48, respectively), for the entire growing period. Improvement in FCR, increase in ADG and reduction in lipid:protein gain ratio by 1 phenotypic SD reduced TNE per pig by 709 g, 307 g, and 211 g, respectively, over the entire growing period. The results indicate that nitrogen excretion changes substantially during growth, and it can be reduced most effectively by improvement of feed efficiency and to a lesser extent through the improvement of BW gain or body composition or both.

BackgroundRecords on groups of individuals rather than on single individuals could be valuable for predicting breeding values (BV) of the traits that are difficult or costly to measure individually, such as feed intake in pigs or beef cattle. Here, we present a model, which handles group records from varying group sizes and involves multiple fixed and random effects, for estimating variance components and predicting BV. Moreover, using simulation, we investigated the efficiency of group records for predicting BV in situations with various group sizes and structures, and factors that affect the trait.ResultsThe results show that the presented model for group records worked well and that variances estimated from group records with varying group sizes were consistent with those estimated from individual records, but with larger standard errors. Ignoring litter and pen effects had very little or no influence on the accuracy of estimated BV (EBV) obtained from group records. However, ignoring litter effects resulted in biased estimates of additive genetic variance and EBV. The presence of litter and pen effects on phenotypes decreased the accuracy of EBV although the prediction model fitted both effects. Having more littermates in the same pen led to a higher accuracy of EBV. The decay of EBV accuracy with increasing group size was more marked for scenarios with litter and pen effects than without. When litters of six individuals were divided into two pens, accuracies of EBV obtained from group records with a size up to 12 (average 9.6) and up to 24 (average 19.2) were 66.6 and 57.6% of those estimated from individual records in the scenario with litter and pen effects on phenotypes. These percentages reached 77.0 and 68.4% in the scenario without litter and pen effects on phenotypes.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the model works appropriately for the analysis of group records from varying group sizes. Using group records for genetic evaluation of traits such as feed intake in pig is feasible and the efficiency of the resulting estimates depends on the size and structure of the groups and on the magnitude of the variances for litter and pen effects.

The consideration of feed efficiency traits is highly relevant in animal breeding due to economic and ecologic impacts of the efficient usage and utilization of feed resources. In pigs, corresponding observations are recorded using automatic feeding stations and serve as one of the main criteria in most pig selection programmes. Simultaneously, feeding stations also generate feeding behaviour data which represent a nearly unused resource and provide a valuable proxy measure of health status, animal welfare, and management practices. In the current study, an integrated approach was applied to a feed efficiency tested and genome-wide genotyped terminal sire line population. Therefore, genetic analyses were performed combining a single-marker based approach and a Bayesian multi-marker algorithm. Major quantitative trait loci (QTL) for feeding behaviour traits comprising daily occupation time, daily feeder visit, and daily feeding rate were identified on chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 14. Feed efficiency was represented by feed conversion ratio and daily feed intake revealing prominent genomic regions on chromosomes 1, 6, 9, and 11. The positional and functional candidate genes identified are involved in transport processes like AQP4, SLC22A23, and SLC6A14 as well as energy sensing, generation, and utilization as exemplified by PPP3CA, IQGAP3, ECI2, and DnaJC15. These molecular features provide the first step towards the dissection of the genetic connection between distinct feeding behaviour patterns, feed efficiency and performance, health, and welfare traits driving the implementation of these traits in breeding programmes and pig husbandry.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00438-017-1325-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

This study aimed to estimate genetic parameters of the linear trait genetic residual feed intake (RFI) and the ratio traits feed conversion ratio (FCR) and feed conversion efficiency (FCE) along with dry matter intake (DMI) and energy sink traits such as energy-corrected milk (ECM), body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), and BW change (BWC) across different weeks in the first lactation of Danish Holstein cows. A second objective was to conduct a Bayesian analysis of direct and correlated superiority of the selected group when selecting on genetic RFI, FCR, or FCE. Feed intake and energy sink traits were recorded during wk 1 to 44 of lactation on 847 primiparous Danish Holstein cows. A Bayesian multivariate random regression animal model was used to analyze DMI, ECM, BW, and BCS in different weeks of lactation. Genetic RFI was obtained by conditioning DMI on ECM, BW, BCS, and BWC using genetic partial regression coefficients. The posterior distribution of the breeding values for FCR and FCE was derived from the posterior distribution of functions of "fixed" environmental effects and random additive genetic effects on DMI and ECM. Genetic superiority of the selected group was defined as the difference in additive genetic mean of the selected top individuals expected to be potential parents, and the total population after integrating genetic trends out of the posterior distribution of selection responses. Posterior means of heritability of genetic RFI ranged from 0.10 to 0.15, genetic variance of FCR and FCE ranged from 2.13 × 10 −3 to 3.2 × 10 −3 (kg 2 DMI/kg 2 ECM) and 6.11 × 10 −3 to 2.4 × 10 −2 (kg 2 ECM/kg 2 DMI), respectively. Selection against RFI showed a direct response of −1.01 to −2.23 kg/d RFI and correlated responses of −0.031 to −0.056 kg/kg for FCR, 0.104 to 0.160 kg/kg for FCE, and −0.316 to −1.057 kg/d for DMI in different weeks of lactation. Selection against RFI had no significant effect on production traits but selection for ratio traits reduced BW and BCS. Posterior means of genetic correlation between DMI and ratio traits were low. In conclusion, the Bayesian procedure allowed us to estimate genetic RFI without the need for separate multiple regression analysis and considered the nonnormal posterior distribution of ratio traits. Selection against genetic RFI might be an effective means to improve feed efficiency compared with ratio traits for feed efficiency in dairy cattle.