In the era of precision medicine, radiotherapy strategies should be determined based on genetic profiles that predict tumor radiosensitivity. Accordingly, pre-clinical research aimed at discovering clinically applicable genetic profiles is needed. However, how a given genetic profile affects cancer cell radiosensitivity is unclear. To address this issue, we performed a pilot in vitro study by utilizing EGFR mutational status as a model for genetic profile. Clonogenic assays of EGFR mutant (n = 6) and wild-type (n = 9) non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell lines were performed independently by two oncologists. Clonogenic survival parameters SF2, SF4, SF6, SF8, mean inactivation dose (MID), D10, D50, α, and β were obtained using the linear quadratic model. The differences in the clonogenic survival parameters between the EGFR mutant and wild-type cell lines were assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test. As a result, for both datasets, the p values for SF2, SF4, D50, α, and α/β were below 0.05, and those for SF2 were lowest. These data indicate that a genetic profile of NSCLC cell lines might be predictive for their radiation response; i.e., EGFR mutant cell lines might be more sensitive to low dose- and low fraction sized-irradiation.

Background and purpose: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) affects the patient's quality of life by making eating and maintaining oral hygiene painful. This study aimed to analyze carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT)induced ORN of the mandible. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 199 patients with head and neck tumors treated with Cion RT was performed from 2010 to 2019. Only 11 patients with tumors located in the oropharynx and floor of the mouth were analyzed. C-ion RT consisted of 57.6 Gy or 64.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions. The mandible was analyzed for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes and bone exposure. The relationship between the radiation dose and ORN of the mandible was analyzed. Results: Five patients (45.5%) had ORN of the mandible. The median follow-up time was 68 months. The median onset times based on MRI changes and bone exposure were 9 and 15 months, respectively. Doses of 30 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) to the mandible and teeth showed the most significant effect, causing ORN at 29.5 ± 6.7 cc and 3.9 ± 1.8 cc, respectively, with cut-off values at 16.5 cc (p = 0.002) and 1.8 cc (p = 0.0059), respectively. Conclusion: This is the first study reporting the incidence, onset time, and risk-predictive dosimetry parameters of C-ion RT-induced ORN of the mandible. Our study will be useful for establishing clinical strategies for C-ion RT to the head and neck near the mandible.

Radiotherapy is an essential component of cancer therapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) promises to improve outcomes compared with standard of care in many cancers. Nevertheless, clinicians often observe in-field recurrence after CIRT. This indicates the presence of a subset of cancers that harbor intrinsic resistance to CIRT. Thus, the development of methods to identify and sensitize CIRT-resistant cancers is needed. To address this issue, we analyzed a unique donor-matched pair of clinical specimens: a treatment-naïve tumor, and the tumor that recurred locally after CIRT in the same patient. Exon sequencing of 409 cancer-related genes identified enrichment of somatic mutations in FGFR3 and FGFR4 in the recurrent tumor compared with the treatment-naïve tumor, indicating a pivotal role for FGFR signaling in cancer cell survival through CIRT. Inhibition of FGFR using the clinically available pan-FGFR inhibitor LY2874455 sensitized multiple cancer cell lines to carbon ions at 3 Gy (RBE: relative biological effectiveness), the daily dose prescribed to the patient. The sensitizer enhancement ratio was 1.66 ± 0.17, 1.27 ± 0.09, and 1.20 ± 0.18 in A549, H1299, and H1703 cells, respectively. Our data indicate the potential usefulness of the analytical pipeline employed in this pilot study to identify targetable mutations associated with resistance to CIRT, and of LY21874455 as a sensitizer for CIRT-resistant cancers. The results warrant validation in larger cohorts.

Background: Tooth loss reduces quality of life; however, little is known about tooth loss caused by carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). Here, we aimed to elucidate the incidence of tooth loss post-CIRT for head and neck tumors and to identify risk-predictive dosimetric parameters. Methods: This study enrolled 14 patients (i.e., 171 teeth in total) with head and neck non-squamous cell carcinoma. All patients received CIRT comprised of 57.6 or 64.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness, RBE) in 16 fractions. Dose–volume analysis of the teeth was performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with VX (i.e., the volume irradiated with X Gy (RBE)). Results: The median follow-up period was 69.1 months. The median time of tooth loss was 38.6 months. The 5 year cumulative incidence of tooth loss was 13.3%. The volume of irradiated teeth was significantly greater for the lost teeth than for the remaining teeth throughout the dose range. Using the cut-offs calculated from ROC curve analysis, V30–V60 showed high accuracy (i.e., >94%) for predicting tooth loss, with V50 being the most accurate (cut-off, 58.1%; accuracy, 0.95). Conclusions: This is the first report to examine the incidence of tooth loss post-CIRT and to identify risk-predictive dosimetric parameters.

No abstract