Women with a diagnosis of breast cancer are at increased risk of second primary cancers, and the identification of risk factors for the latter may have clinical implications. We have followed‐up for 11 years 10,045 women with invasive breast cancer from a European cohort, and identified 492 second primary cancers, including 140 contralateral breast cancers. Expected and observed cases and Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR) were estimated using Aalen‐Johansen Markovian methods. Information on various risk factors was obtained from detailed questionnaires and anthropometric measurements. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the role of risk factors. Women with breast cancer had a 30% excess risk for second malignancies (95% confidence interval—CI 18–42) after excluding contralateral breast cancers. Risk was particularly elevated for colorectal cancer (SIR, 1.71, 95% CI 1.43–2.00), lymphoma (SIR 1.80, 95% CI 1.31–2.40), melanoma (2.12; 1.63–2.70), endometrium (2.18; 1.75–2.70) and kidney cancers (2.40; 1.57–3.52). Risk of second malignancies was positively associated with age at first cancer, body mass index and smoking status, while it was inversely associated with education, post‐menopausal status and a history of full‐term pregnancy. We describe in a large cohort of women with breast cancer a 30% excess of second primaries. Among risk factors for breast cancer, a history of full‐term pregnancy was inversely associated with the risk of second primary cancer.

BackgroundReproductive events are associated with important physiologic changes, yet little is known about how reproductive factors influence long-term health in women. Our objective was to assess the relation of reproductive characteristics with all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk.MethodsThe analysis was performed within the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition prospective cohort study, which enrolled >500,000 women and men from 1992 to 2000, who were residing in a given town/geographic area in 10 European countries. The current analysis included 322,972 eligible women aged 25–70 years with 99 % complete follow-up for vital status. We assessed reproductive characteristics reported at the study baseline including parity, age at the first birth, breastfeeding, infertility, oral contraceptive use, age at menarche and menopause, total ovulatory years, and history of oophorectomy/hysterectomy. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for menopausal status, body mass index, physical activity, education level, and smoking status/intensity and duration.ResultsDuring a mean follow-up of 12.9 years, 14,383 deaths occurred. The HR (95 % CI) for risk of all-cause mortality was lower in parous versus nulliparous women (0.80; 0.76–0.84), in women who had ever versus never breastfed (0.92; 0.87–0.97), in ever versus never users of oral contraceptives (among non-smokers; 0.90; 0.86–0.95), and in women reporting a later age at menarche (≥15 years versus <12; 0.90; 0.85–0.96; P for trend = 0.038).ConclusionsChildbirth, breastfeeding, oral contraceptive use, and a later age at menarche were associated with better health outcomes. These findings may contribute to the development of improved strategies to promote better long-term health in women.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0484-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer as well as one of the main causes of cancer-related mortality in women. Human microbial dysbiosis, which has been related to a range of malignancies, is one of the variables that may impact the chance of developing breast disorders. In this review, we aimed to investigate the relationship between breast cancer and benign breast tumors with dysbiosis of the microbiome at different body sites. We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, Scopus, Ovid, and Cochrane Library to identify original articles published until July 2020 that reported studies of breast disease and microbiota. Twenty-four original articles were included in the study, which looked at the features and changes in breast, gut, urine, lymph node, and sputum microbial diversity in patients with benign and malignant breast tumors. In breast cancer, the breast tissue microbiome demonstrated changes in terms of bacterial load and diversity; in benign breast tumors, the microbiome was more similar to a malignant tumor than to normal breast tissue. Triple-negative (TNBC) and triple-positive (TPBC) types of breast cancer have a distinct microbial pattern. Moreover, in breast cancer, gut microbiota displayed changes in the compositional abundance of some bacterial families and microbial metabolites synthesis. Our review concludes that breast carcinogenesis seems to be associated with microbial dysbiosis. This information can be further explored in larger-scale studies to guide new prophylactic, diagnostic, and therapeutic measures for breast cancer.

Background and purpose Role models in the medical field are professional and experienced persons whose actions unconsciously inspire juniors to strive to be like them. To our knowledge, no studies have examined whether having a female surgical role model has influenced women to pursue a surgical career in Saudi Arabia. Hence, we sought to evaluate whether identifying role models in surgery influences career choice and defined the ideal qualities of a surgical role model as perceived by newly qualified doctors. Methods We employed a cross-sectional, survey- based study design, conducted between June 2020 and January 2021, in which female surgical residents completed a questionnaire about their perceptions and influence of role models in general surgery specialty at the time they pursue a career in surgery. Results A total of 51 respondents completed the questionnaire. The majority of them (78.4%) had a role model and (19.6%) indicated that their role model was a female. Of those who had a role model, (67.5%) agreed that they experienced a positive influence on their surgical career choice. Clinical and operation skills were reported as the most remarkable factor to be considered in their role models. Working directly with a male surgical consultant and female surgical residents imprinted a positive influence but this did not reach a statistical significance. Conclusion The findings of this article contribute empirically to the strong effects of the same-sex role models and highlight the curial role of surgical residents in influencing female’s career choices in general surgery as an achievable and attainable domain. Which encourage the creation of national mentorship programs and exploring more in barriers for pursuing a surgical career.