Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) targeting the programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) has shown promising results in the fight against cancer. Systemic anti-tumor reactions due to radiation therapy (RT) can lead to regression of non-irradiated lesions (NiLs), termed “abscopal effect” (AbE). Combination of both treatments can enhance this effect. The aim of this study was to evaluate AbEs during anti-PD-1 therapy and irradiation. We screened 168 patients receiving pembrolizumab or nivolumab at our center. Inclusion criteria were start of RT within 1 month after the first or last application of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and at least one metastasis outside the irradiation field. We estimated the total dose during ICI for each patient using the linear quadratic (LQ) model expressed as 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) using α/β of 10 Gy. Radiological images were required showing progression or no change in NiLs before and regression after completion of RT(s). Images must have been acquired at least 4 weeks after the onset of ICI or RT. The surface areas of the longest diameters of the short- and long-axes of NiLs were measured. One hundred twenty-six out of 168 (75%) patients received ICI and RT. Fifty-three percent (67/126) were treated simultaneously, and 24 of these (36%) were eligible for lesion analysis. AbE was observed in 29% (7/24). One to six lesions (mean = 3 ± 2) in each AbE patient were analyzed. Patients were diagnosed with malignant melanoma (MM) (
n
= 3), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (
n
= 3), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (
n
= 1). They were irradiated once (
n
= 1), twice (
n
= 2), or three times (
n
= 4) with an average total EQD2 of 120.0 ± 37.7 Gy. Eighty-two percent of RTs of AbE patients were applied with high single doses. MM patients received pembrolizumab, NSCLC, and RCC patients received nivolumab for an average duration of 45 ± 35 weeks. We demonstrate that 29% of the analyzed patients showed AbE. Strict inclusion criteria were applied to distinguish the effects of AbE from the systemic effect of ICI. Our data suggest the clinical existence of systemic effects of irradiation under ICI and could contribute to the development of a broader range of cancer treatments.
Purpose: We investigated the value of O-(2-[ 18 F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ( 18 F-FET) PET for treatment monitoring of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) or targeted therapy (TT) alone or in combination with radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases (BM) since contrastenhanced MRI often remains inconclusive. Methods: We retrospectively identified 40 patients with 107 BM secondary to melanoma (n=29 with 75 BM) or non-small cell lung cancer (n=11 with 32 BM) treated with ICI or TT who had 18 F-FET PET (n=60 scans) for treatment monitoring from 2015-2019. The majority of patients (n=37; 92.5%) had radiotherapy during the course of disease. In 27patients, 18 F-FET PET was used for the differentiation of treatment-related changes from BM relapse following ICI or TT. In 13 patients, 18 F-FET PET was performed for response assessement to ICI or TT using baseline and follow-up scans (median time between scans, 4.2 months). In all lesions, static and dynamic 18 F-FET PET parameters were obtained (i.e., mean tumor-to-brain ratios (TBR), time-to-peak values). Diagnostic accuracies of PET parameters were evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic analyses using the clinical follow-up or neuropathological findings as reference.Results: A TBR threshold of 1.95 differentiated BM relapse from treatment-related changes with an accuracy of 85% (P=0.003). Metabolic responders to ICI or TT on 18 F-FET PET had a significantly longer stable follow-up (threshold of TBR reduction relative to baseline, ≥10%; accuracy, 82%; P=0.004). Furthermore, at follow-up, time-to-peak values in metabolic responders increased significantly (P=0.019).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.