Introduction The COVID‐19 pandemic caused an unprecedented impact to haemophilia healthcare delivery. In particular, rapid implementation of telehealth solutions was required to ensure continued access to comprehensive care. Aims To explore patient and healthcare provider (HCP) experience of telehealth in a European Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre. Method A systematic evaluation was performed to survey patient and HCP experience and compare clinical activity levels with telehealth to in‐person attendances. Results Public health measures implemented in March 2020 to reduce COVID‐19 spread resulted in a 63% decrease in medical/nursing clinic consultation activity compared to the same period in 2019. Implementation of digital care pathways resulted in marked increase in activity (52% greater than 2019). Importantly, enhanced patient engagement was noted, with a 60% reduction in non‐attendance rates. Survey of patients who had participated in medical/nursing teleconsultations demonstrated that teleconsultations improved access (79%), reduced inconvenience (82%), was easy to use (94%) and facilitated good communication with the HCP (97%). A survey exploring the telemedicine experience of HCPs, illustrated that HCPs were satisfied with teleconsultation and the majority (79%) would like to continue to offer teleconsultation as part of routine patient care. In addition to medical/nursing reviews, continued access to physiotherapy with virtual exercise classes for people with haemophilia and teleconsultation for acute dental issues was equally successful. Conclusion During an unprecedented public health emergency, telehealth has enabled continued access to specialized haemophilia comprehensive care. Our novel findings show that this alternative is acceptable to both patients and HCPs and offers future novel opportunities.

Introduction: Recombinant factor IX fusion protein concentrate (rFIXFc) is increasingly used for prophylaxis in people with haemophilia B (PWHB), but experience in the perioperative setting is limited. Aims:To evaluate real-world perioperative factor usage, bleeding and complications in PWHB (≥18 years) who received rFIXFc for surgical haemostasis and to describe the treatment regimens used.Methods: Single centre, retrospective review of all PWHB who underwent a major or minor surgical procedure between June 2017 and July 2020 and received rFIXFc perioperatively for maintenance of surgical haemostasis.Results: A total of 56 PWHB (45 male and 11 female), including people with mild (n = 32), moderate (n = 4) and severe (n = 20) haemophilia B, underwent 11 major and 131 minor procedures with rFIXFc for surgical haemostasis. Haemostasis was rated as excellent (9/11) or good (2/11) in all major procedures. Median total rFIXFc consumption for orthopaedic surgeries was 972 IU/kg (range 812-1031 IU/kg) and for other major (non-orthopaedic) surgeries was 323 IU/kg (range 167-760 IU/kg). The median number of perioperative rFIXFc infusions was 19 (range 17-26) for orthopaedic surgery and 7 (range 5-17) for other major surgeries. The number of infusions in the postoperative period was determined by procedure and patient factors. Complications included bowel ileus and wound infection. Most minor procedures were managed with single infusion of rFIXFc, with no bleeding complications in 95% of minor procedures. There were no thromboembolic events or inhibitor formation. Conclusion:This unique data provides real-world evidence that rFIXFc is safe and effective in achieving haemostasis in PWHB undergoing surgery.

Aim: This study aimed to examine physical activity (PA), physical fitness and cardiometabolic risk amongst people with moderate and severe haemophilia (PwMSH). Methods:The following domains were examined: PA (accelerometry); functional aerobic capacity (6-Minute Walk Test); grip strength (dynamometry); balance (One Leg Stand Test); body composition (anthropometry and bioimpedance analysis); blood pressure; arterial stiffness; and cardiometabolic disorders.Results: A total of 53 PwMSH (44 years) and 33 controls (43 years; p = .679) were recruited. Compared to controls, PwMSH were significantly less active in moderate and vigorous PA parameters (all p < .05), and less physically fit indicated by 6-Minute Walk distance (p < .0005), grip strength (p = .040) and balance (p < .0005). PwMSH had higher rates of abdominal adiposity compared to controls measured by waist circumference indices (all p < .05). Resting blood pressure and arterial stiffness were not significantly different (p = .797 and .818, respectively). With respect to overall PA, World Health Organisation recommended targets for adults were achieved by the majority of both groups (haemophilia: 72.9% vs. controls: 90.0%; p = .069). Importantly, the number of PwMSH who achieved guideline recommended PA via longer, sustained bouts of moderate-vigorous PA was significantly lower compared to controls (18.8% vs. 56.7%; p = .001). Lastly, clinically diagnosed hypertension, insulin resistance and hyperlipidaemia were more prevalent amongst PwMSH compared to controls. Conclusion:Low levels of PA and physical fitness, and significant rates of abdominal adiposity and hypertension may collectively influence the risk and severity of various cardiometabolic and/or musculoskeletal health issues amongst ageing PwMSH.Personalised multi-disciplinary health interventions involving PA, dietary and health psychology input for PwMSH warrant future investigation.