No abstract

No abstract

Background Lithium is recommended as a first line treatment for bipolar disorders. However, only 30% of patients show an optimal outcome and variability in lithium response and tolerability is poorly understood. It remains difficult for clinicians to reliably predict which patients will benefit without recourse to a lengthy treatment trial. Greater precision in the early identification of individuals who are likely to respond to lithium is a significant unmet clinical need. Structure The H2020-funded Response to Lithium Network (R-LiNK; http://www.r-link.eu.com/) will undertake a prospective cohort study of over 300 individuals with bipolar-I-disorder who have agreed to commence a trial of lithium treatment following a recommendation by their treating clinician. The study aims to examine the early prediction of lithium response, non-response and tolerability by combining systematic clinical syndrome subtyping with examination of multi-modal biomarkers (or biosignatures), including omics, neuroimaging, and actigraphy, etc. Individuals will be followed up for 24 months and an independent panel will assess and classify each participants’ response to lithium according to predefined criteria that consider evidence of relapse, recurrence, remission, changes in illness activity or treatment failure (e.g. stopping lithium; new prescriptions of other mood stabilizers) and exposure to lithium. Novel elements of this study include the recruitment of a large, multinational, clinically representative sample specifically for the purpose of studying candidate biomarkers and biosignatures; the application of lithium-7 magnetic resonance imaging to explore the distribution of lithium in the brain; development of a digital phenotype (using actigraphy and ecological momentary assessment) to monitor daily variability in symptoms; and economic modelling of the cost-effectiveness of introducing biomarker tests for the customisation of lithium treatment into clinical practice. Also, study participants with sub-optimal medication adherence will be offered brief interventions (which can be delivered via a clinician or smartphone app) to enhance treatment engagement and to minimize confounding of lithium non-response with non-adherence. Conclusions The paper outlines the rationale, design and methodology of the first study being undertaken by the newly established R-LiNK collaboration and describes how the project may help to refine the clinical response phenotype and could translate into the personalization of lithium treatment.

Objective Mood instability in patients with bipolar disorder has been associated with impaired functioning and risk of relapse. The present study aimed to investigate whether increased mood instability is associated with increased perceived stress and impaired quality of life and functioning in patients with bipolar disorder. Methods A total of 84 patients with bipolar disorder used a smartphone‐based self‐monitoring system on a daily basis for 9 months. Data on perceived stress, quality of life, and clinically rated functioning were collected at five fixed time points for each patient during follow‐up. A group of 37 healthy individuals served as a control comparison of perceived stress, quality of life, and psychosocial functioning. Results The majority of patients presented in full or partial remission. As hypothesized, mood instability was significantly associated with increased perceived stress (B: 10.52, 95% CI: 5.25; 15.77, P < 0.0001) and decreased quality of life (B: −12.17, 95% CI. −19.54; −4.79, P < 0.0001) and functioning (B: −12.04, 95% CI: −19.08; −4.99, P < 0.0001) in patients with bipolar disorder. There were no differences in mood instability according to prescribed psychopharmacological treatment. Compared with healthy individuals, patients reported substantially increased perceived stress and experienced decreased quality of life and decreased functioning based on researcher‐blinded evaluation. Conclusion Mood instability in bipolar disorder is associated with increased perceived stress and decreased quality of life and functioning even during full or partial remission. There is a need to monitor and identify subsyndromal inter‐episodic symptoms. Future studies investigating the effect of treatment on mood instability are highly warranted.