The present paper deals with the influence of the duration of isothermal spheroidization annealing on the evolution of pearlite bands in various initial states. In this study, two initial conditions of the steel 16MnCrS5 are considered: a) industrially hot-rolled pearlite structures in their ferritic matrix and b) a specifically adjusted microstructure in the lab condition. Based on the experimental investigations and quantitative microstructural analyses, an empirical model for the prediction of pearlite banding within a broad range of annealing durations could be derived. Both, experiment and model, agree that pronounced pearlite bands in the initial state almost disappear after 25 h of spheroidization annealing. On the other hand, a marginal degree of pearlite banding in the initial state increases slightly during annealing. This fact could be explained by inhomogeneous cementite formation inside and outside the primary segregation regions of manganese.
In the present paper a practically relevant extension of the known modelling methods with regard to the description of forming limits of steels typically used in the cold bulk forming is developed and implemented in a commercial finite element code Abaqus. The modeling approach is based on the so-called micromechanical damage concepts which represent the microstructure evolution more detailed than phenomenological models and, therefore, provide better prediction of damage and failure during the forming process. Particularly, the well-known damage models of Gurson as well as Gologanu-Leblond are considered. It is shown that in combination with fracture criteria such models are able to describe failure in bulk forming
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.