No abstract

Introduction The ‘hearing aid effect’ is a negative perception toward individuals using hearing assistive devices (HADs), which is a primary reason for parents and children refusing to use them. We aimed to determine the current perception toward individuals using HADs and the associated factors. Methods A 30-item photo-based survey was conducted to analyze the participants’ perception toward individuals using HADs as compared to healthy (H) individuals and individuals with disabilities (D). The survey was validated with an intrarater reliability of 86%. A cross-sectional study was conducted by approaching individuals who visited one of the largest shopping centers in a metropolitan city to participate in the survey. Demographic information, including age, gender, and educational background, was collected. Results A total of 517 participants completed the survey. Nearly two-thirds of the participants (59.7%) did not consider individuals using HADs as those who needed assistance as compared to H individuals. Interestingly, Generation X and Z participants had a significantly better perception toward individuals using HADs (63.1% and 59%, respectively) as compared to participants of the Baby Boomers generation (54.3%). The majority of participants who considered HD use a handicap compared to healthy individuals (79.9%) did not have a family member that used a HAD. Conclusion The stigma of wearing a HAD is significantly reducing with time, and the younger generations are not considering it as a disability. This is an important point that can be highlighted while counseling parents and young adults who are candidates for HAD use.

Objectives: Obesity is a primary public health concern in Saudi Arabia. The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected people's lives, putting considerable pressure on children and adolescents, leading to psychological problems. Therefore, we aimed to assess obesity's psychological and behavioral impact among children and adolescents before and during the COVID-19 lockdown in Jeddah. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the pediatric endocrine outpatient clinic at King Abdulaziz University Hospital(KAUH). The sample included 360 participants. Data were collected through clinical interviews by telecommunication from April to June 2020. Demographic factors and answers to questions about behavior, feelings, and daily life (pre and during home quarantine) were assessed against the participants’ body mass index (BMI) and reported daily life difficulties. The BMI standard deviation was calculated based on the Center of Disease Control and Prevention standards. Results: Compared to other groups, a significantly higher percentage of overweight/obese participants reported low self-confidence (22.1%), 61.7% reported that their friends or family rarely bullied or picked on them and 66.4% reported that the people who they lived with rarely made fun of or bullied them due to their weight before home quarantine. Conclusion: Children with a higher BMI reported lower self-confidence than their average weight peers before home quarantine. However, a higher BMI did not increase the risk of being bullied by family members and friends. The majority of the participants changed for the worse in every research aspect during quarantine.

BackgroundThere are numerous quality-of-life (QoL) assessment tools available; however, only a few are designed specifically for children with chronic conditions. Among these assessment tools are the Hearing Environments and Reflection on QoL questionnaires for children (HEAR-QL26, HEAR-Q28) developed by Washington University. Unfortunately, there are no other tools that assess hearing loss, and none of them are in Arabic. This paper aims to adapt the HEAR-QL to Arabic and provide an accessible method of measuring the QoL of children with hearing loss in our Arabic-speaking populations. MethodologyAn independent medical translator translated the HEAR-QL26 and HEAR-QL28 into Arabic. The translations were then examined by two bilingual, native Arabic-speaking otolaryngologists who modified the inadequate questions. Back-translation of the Arabic version into English was subsequently performed by an independent translator. Intra-rater reliability was tested for each of HEAR-QL26 and HEAR-QL28 using 10 participants for each survey, where the participants answered the surveys twice with a period of two weeks between them. A pilot study was conducted which had a total of 40 participants divided equally between the two surveys where each group had an equal number of hearing participants and participants with hearing loss. ResultsBoth HEAR-QL26 and HEAR-QL28 were validated with an overall intra-rater reliability of 88.85% and 87.86% respectively. In the pilot study, the HEAR-QL26 participants with normal hearing scored a median of 2437.5, while the participants with hearing loss scored a median of 1837.5 (p = 0.001). Moreover, HEAR-QL28 participants had a median score of 2725 among participants with normal hearing and 1725 for participants with hearing loss (p = 0.001). ConclusionHEAR-QL is a well-established QoL in children with hearing loss. The validated Arabic adaptation can now be used to measure deafness in Arabic-speaking children.