Coronary obstruction following aortic ViV procedures is a life-threatening complication that occurred more frequently in patients with prior stentless or stented bioprostheses with externally mounted leaflets and in those with a short VTC.

Aims Due to bioprosthetic valve degeneration, aortic valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures are increasingly performed. There are no data on long-term outcomes after aortic ViV. Our aim was to perform a large-scale assessment of long-term survival and reintervention after aortic ViV. Methods and results A total of 1006 aortic ViV procedures performed more than 5 years ago [mean age 77.7 ± 9.7 years; 58.8% male; median STS-PROM score 7.3% (4.2–12.0)] were included in the analysis. Patients were treated with Medtronic self-expandable valves (CoreValve/Evolut, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) (n = 523, 52.0%), Edwards balloon-expandable valves (EBEV, SAPIEN/SAPIEN XT/SAPIEN 3, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) (n = 435, 43.2%), and other devices (n = 48, 4.8%). Survival was lower at 8 years in patients with small-failed bioprostheses [internal diameter (ID) ≤ 20 mm] compared with those with large-failed bioprostheses (ID > 20 mm) (33.2% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.01). Independent correlates for mortality included smaller-failed bioprosthetic valves [hazard ratio (HR) 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.13)], age [HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01–1.45)], and non-transfemoral access [HR 1.43 (95% CI 1.11–1.84)]. There were 40 reinterventions after ViV. Independent correlates for all-cause reintervention included pre-existing severe prosthesis–patient mismatch [subhazard ratio (SHR) 4.34 (95% CI 1.31–14.39)], device malposition [SHR 3.75 (95% CI 1.36–10.35)], EBEV [SHR 3.34 (95% CI 1.26–8.85)], and age [SHR 0.59 (95% CI 0.44–0.78)]. Conclusions The size of the original failed valve may influence long-term mortality, and the type of the transcatheter valve may influence the need for reintervention after aortic ViV.

Changes in CCO across coronary stenoses seem to predict abnormal (TIMI flow grade < 3) resting coronary blood flow. Further studies are needed to understand its incremental diagnostic value and its potential to measure stress coronary blood flow.

A case of community-acquired, culture-negative, infective endocarditis was diagnosed in a 57-year-old construction worker. Small, pleomorphic gram-negative rods were seen in Brown-Hopps tissue gram stains and Warthin-Starry silver stains. The organism was identified as Rochalimaea henselae by polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing of the 16S rDNA gene sequence. This is the first report of infective endocarditis caused by R henselae.

Background Limited data exist on clinical valve thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve (ViV) implantation. Our objective was to determine the incidence, timing, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes of patients diagnosed with clinical ViV thrombosis. Methods and Results Centers participating in the Valve-in-Valve International Data Registry were surveyed for thrombosis cases, and clinical valve thrombosis was defined based on a combination of the presence of new valve dysfunction and an imaging evidence of leaflet thrombosis. Three hundred ViV implantations were included. The surgical valve was stented in 86.3% and stentless in 13.7% of cases; and the transcatheter heart valve was self-expanding in 50%, balloon-expandable in 49%, and mechanically expanding in 1.0%. The incidence of clinical valve thrombosis was 7.6% (n=23), diagnosed at a median time of 101 days (interquartile range, 21–226) after the procedure. Fifteen patients (65%) presented with worsening symptoms and 21 (91%) with transvalvular mean gradient elevation. The mean gradient at the time of diagnosis (median 39 mm Hg; interquartile range, 30–44) was significantly higher than immediately post-ViV (13 mm Hg; interquartile range, 8–20.5; P <0.001) and was significantly reduced after oral anticoagulation therapy (17.5 mm Hg; interquartile range, 11–20.5; P <0.001). There were no deaths or strokes related to valve thrombosis. Factors associated with valve thrombosis were oral anticoagulation (odds ratio [95% confidence limits]: 0.067 [0.008–0.543], P =0.011), surgical valve true internal diameter indexed to body surface area (0.537 [0.331–0.873], P =0.012), and Mosaic or Hancock II stented porcine bioprostheses (4.01 [1.287–12.485], P =0.017). Conclusions Clinical valve thrombosis after transcatheter aortic ViV implantation is common, especially in patients not on oral anticoagulation. Although aortic ViV is commonly associated with elevated gradients, valve thrombosis should be ruled out if gradients increase compared with early postprocedural values. A higher incidence was observed after treatment of certain stented porcine surgical valve types, suggesting a specific adjustment of the adjunctive antithrombotic therapy in this subset of ViV patients.