Futile diagnostic work-ups and operations must be reduced before LDCT screening can be broadly used. Stage I adenocarcinoma dominated in the NSCLC patients who underwent surgery.
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is one of the most promising tools for reducing mortality from lung cancer. OBjeCTIves The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of an open-access lung cancer screening program with LDCT. PATIeNTs AND meThODs In total, 8649 asymptomatic volunteers between 50 and 75 years of age with a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years underwent LDCT screening. The presence of lung nodules with a diameter of less than 5 mm required a follow-up control visit after 12 months, and with a diameter of 5 to 10 mm-after 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients with a nodule of more than 10 mm in diameter required further diagnostic workup. ResUlTs Lung nodules were detected in 4694 individuals (54%). Lung cancer was diagnosed in 107 patients (1.24%). Of 8649 participants, 300 (3.5%) were referred for further diagnostic workup, and 125 (1.5%) underwent surgical resection (81 because of malignant lesions; 44, benign lesions). Eighty-one participants (75%) underwent surgery with a curative intent, and 26 participants underwent oncological treatment. There were no perioperative deaths. The majority of surgical patients underwent lobectomy (video-assisted, in 30 patients; and open, in 38 patients). Stage I non-small cell lung cancer was detected in 64 of the surgical patients (79%). CONClUsIONs The detection rate of lung cancer in the screening program with low-dose computed tomography is relatively low but patients were diagnosed at a very early stage of the disease compared with standard clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons’ recommendations confirm the implementation of lung cancer screening in Europe. We compared 2 screening programmes, the Pilot Pomeranian Lung Cancer Screening Programme (pilot study) and the Moltest Bis programme, completed in a single centre. METHODS A total of 8649 healthy volunteers (aged 50–75 years, smoking history ≥20 pack-years) were enrolled in a pilot study between 2009 and 2011, and a total of 5534 healthy volunteers (aged 50–79, smoking history ≥30 pack-years) were enrolled in the Moltest Bis programme between 2016 and 2017. Each participant had a low-dose computed tomography scan of the chest. Participants with a nodule diameter of >10 mm or with suspected tumour morphology underwent a diagnostic work-up in the pilot study. In the Moltest Bis programme, the criteria were based on the volume of the detected nodule on the baseline low-dose computed tomography scan and the volume doubling time in the subsequent rounds. RESULTS Lung cancer was diagnosed in 107 (1.24%) and 105 (1.90%) participants of the pilot study and of the Moltest Bis programme, respectively (P = 0.002). A total of 300 (3.5%) and 199 (3.6%) patients, respectively, were referred for further invasive diagnostic work-ups (P = 0.69). A total of 125 (1.5%) and 80 (1.5%) patients, respectively, underwent surgical resection (P = 0.74). The number of resected benign lesions was similar: 44 (35.0%) and 20 (25.0%), respectively (P = 0.13), but with a downwards trend. Lobectomies and/or segmentectomies were performed in 84.0% and 90.0% of patients with lung cancer, respectively (P = 0.22). Notably, patients in the Moltest Bis programme underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery more often than did those in the pilot study (72.5% vs 24.0%, P < 0.001). Surgical patients with stages I and II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounted for 83.4% of the Moltest patients and 86.4% of the pilot study patients (P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS Modified inclusion criteria in the screening programme lead to a higher detection rate of NSCLC. Growing expertise in lung cancer screening leads to increased indications for minimally invasive surgery and an increased proportion of lung-sparing resections. A single-team experience in lung cancer screening does not lead to a major reduction in the rate of diagnostic procedures and operations for non-malignant lesions.
Background In 2010, the World Health Organisation recommended implementation of screening programmes in four groups of diseases—neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is due to the fact that they share the same, modifiable risk factors. Methods Between 2009 and 2011, 8637 heavy smokers (aged 50–75, smoking history >20 pack-years) were screened in the Pomeranian Pilot Lung Cancer Screening Programme (PPP) in Gdańsk, Poland. We looked at 5-year follow-up and analysed the medical events and comorbidities of all participants. One health care provider in the Polish health care system provides a unique opportunity to gather most reliable data on all medical events in each person. Results In 52.0% of lung cancer screening participants CVD (33.5%), DM (26.0%) and COPD (21.0%) were diagnosed. Prevalence of these diseases is higher in lung cancer patients than in the non-cancer screening group (P < 0.0001). One hundred and seven (1.2%) lung cancers were diagnosed during PPP programme performance and another 382 cases (4.4%) in the 5-year follow-up, so the potential mean annual lung cancer detection rate is 0.77%. Conclusions Lung cancer screening programme offers a great potential for joint screening of lung cancer, CVD, diabetes and COPD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.