The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies is widespread in many chronic illnesses, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of increasingly effective antiretroviral therapy on the use of CAM in an HIV-positive patient population. A written survey was given to 191 HIV-positive outpatients. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. One hundred twenty-eight patients (67%) used CAM at some time to control HIV and 76 (40%) of the patients were currently using CAM. The major forms of CAM used were exercise (43%), lifestyle changes (38%), dietary supplements (37%), counseling (27%), herbal medications (26%), megavitamins (24%), and prayer therapy (24%). One hundred forty-one patients (74%) used a protease inhibitor medication, 28 (15%) used a protease inhibitor sparing regime, and 22 (11%) had no current or prior antiretroviral use. Eighty-two (43%) patients indicated that their doctor knew they used CAM and 56 patients (29%) received their information about CAM from a doctor or other health care professional. Of 128 patients who used CAM, 90 (70%) felt CAM improved their quality of life. Income of $15,000 or more per year and discontinuation of medications by patients for any reason in the past were the best predicators of CAM use for patients in general and also those on protease inhibitor therapy. CD(4) count, educational status, year of HIV diagnosis, and martial status were not effective predictors of CAM use. Use of CAM remains widespread among patients with HIV infection even with the availability of effective, yet noncurative antiretroviral therapy and does not correlate with type of antiretroviral therapy used or clinical status.

Among patients who cannot tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, atovaquone and dapsone are similarly effective for the prevention of P. carinii pneumonia. Our results support the continuation of dapsone prophylaxis among patients who are already receiving it. However, among those not receiving dapsone, atovaquone is better tolerated and may be the preferred choice for prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia.

: In treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients, SQV/r treatment was noninferior in virologic suppression at 48 weeks to LPV/r treatment and offered a better triglyceride profile.

In the presence of omeprazole, total saquinavir plasma exposure is significantly increased (82% increase in AUC). The mechanism of this interaction requires elucidation. Despite the significant increase in saquinavir exposure, no short term toxicities were observed.

Objectives. Rifampin is a potent inducer of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme (CYP3A4) that metabolizes most protease inhibitor (PI) antiretrovirals. This study was designed to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the coadministration of the PIs saquinavir and ritonavir (a CYP3A4 inhibitor used as a pharmacoenhancer of other PIs) and rifampin when coadministered in healthy HIV-negative volunteers. Methods.In an open-label, randomized, one sequence, two-period crossover study involving 28 healthy HIVnegative volunteers, arm 1 was randomized to receive saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily while arm 2 received rifampin 600 mg once daily for 14 days. Both arms were then to receive concomitant saquinavir/ritonavir and rifampin for 2 additional weeks. Vital signs, electrocardiography, laboratory analyses, and blood levels of total saquinavir, ritonavir, rifampin, and desacetyl-rifampin, the primary metabolite of rifampin, were measured. Results. In arm 1, 10/14 (71%) and, in arm 2, 11/14 (79%) participants completed the first study phase; eight participants in arm 1 and nine in arm 2 went on to receive both saquinavir/ritonavir and rifampin. Following substantial elevations (Ն grade 2) in hepatic transaminases in participants receiving the coadministered agents, the study was discontinued prematurely. Two participants in arm 1 displayed moderate elevations after five and four doses of rifampin, respectively. In arm 2, all participants experienced severe elevations within 4 days of initiating saquinavir/ritonavir. Clinical symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and headache) were more common and severe in arm 2. Clinical symptoms abated and transaminases normalized following drug discontinuation. Limited pharmacokinetic data suggest a possible relationship between transaminase elevation and elevated rifampin and desacetyl-rifampin concentrations. Conclusions. Although not confirmed in HIV-infected patients, the data indicate that rifampin should not be coadministered with saquinavir/ritonavir.