Attention plays a fundamental role in selectively processing stimuli in our environment despite distraction. Spatial attention induces increasing and decreasing power of neural alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz) in brain regions ipsilateral and contralateral to the locus of attention, respectively. This study tested whether the hemispheric lateralization of alpha power codes not just the spatial location but also the temporal structure of the stimulus. Participants attended to spoken digits presented to one ear and ignored tightly synchronized distracting digits presented to the other ear. In the magnetoencephalogram, spatial attention induced lateralization of alpha power in parietal, but notably also in auditory cortical regions. This alpha power lateralization was not maintained steadily but fluctuated in synchrony with the speech rate and lagged the time course of low-frequency (1-5 Hz) sensory synchronization. Higher amplitude of alpha power modulation at the speech rate was predictive of a listener's enhanced performance of stream-specific speech comprehension. Our findings demonstrate that alpha power lateralization is modulated in tune with the sensory input and acts as a spatiotemporal filter controlling the read-out of sensory content.attention | neural oscillations | alpha lateralization | synchronization | speech N eural oscillations are tenable biological substrates to instantiate attentional selection of sensory information from our environment (1-3). The power of alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz) is modulated by the degree of selective attention to a behaviorally relevant stimulus (4-6). Attentive focusing to one side in auditory, visual, or tactile space leads to a relative decrease in alpha power in contralateral compared with ipsilateral sensory brain regions (7-10) and governs success of selective attention, that is, of isolating one stimulus at a specific spatial location (11-13) in the context of other distracting stimuli. In speech, however, spatial selective attention alone does not suffice for successful speech comprehension given the multiple timescales (e.g., syllable and word rate) over which speech varies. Any attentional neural mechanism that respects the temporal structure of auditory sensory inputs must therefore be dynamic over time. Here, we tested the hypothesis that spatial attention to one of two concurrent speech streams induces a lateralization of alpha power that synchronizes with the speech rate over time and enhances speech comprehension.In addition to neural alpha oscillations and their role in selective attention, low-frequency neural oscillations (delta/theta band; 1-5 Hz) in sensory cortices synchronize with the temporal structure of acoustic stimuli (14, 15) such as human speech (16,17), and this synchronization supports perception (18). Furthermore, synchronization of low-frequency neural oscillations with speech is enhanced for speech streams to which participants attend (19,20). Critically, low-frequency oscillations are commonly specified as phase-locked activity (synchroni...

How does acoustic degradation affect the neural mechanisms of working memory? Enhanced alpha oscillations (8 -13 Hz) during retention of items in working memory are often interpreted to reflect increased demands on storage and inhibition. We hypothesized that auditory signal degradation poses an additional challenge to human listeners partly because it draws on the same neural mechanisms. In an adapted Sternberg paradigm, auditory memory load and acoustic degradation were parametrically varied and the magnetoencephalographic response was analyzed in the time-frequency domain. Notably, during the stimulus-free delay interval, alpha power monotonically increased at central-parietal sensors as functions of memory load (higher alpha power with more memory load) and of acoustic degradation (also higher alpha power with more severe acoustic degradation). This alpha effect was superadditive when highest load was combined with most severe degradation. Moreover, alpha oscillatory dynamics during stimulus-free delay were predictive of response times to the probe item. Source localization of alpha power during stimulus-free delay indicated that alpha generators in right parietal, cingulate, supramarginal, and superior temporal cortex were sensitive to combined memory load and acoustic degradation. In summary, both challenges of memory load and acoustic degradation increase activity in a common alpha-frequency network. The results set the stage for future studies on how chronic or acute degradations of sensory input affect mechanisms of executive control.

Listening to speech is often demanding because of signal degradations and the presence of distracting sounds (i.e., “noise”). The question how the brain achieves the task of extracting only relevant information from the mixture of sounds reaching the ear (i.e., “cocktail party problem”) is still open. In analogy to recent findings in vision, we propose cortical alpha (~10 Hz) oscillations measurable using M/EEG as a pivotal mechanism to selectively inhibit the processing of noise to improve auditory selective attention to task-relevant signals. We review initial evidence of enhanced alpha activity in selective listening tasks, suggesting a significant role of alpha-modulated noise suppression in speech. We discuss the importance of dissociating between noise interference in the auditory periphery (i.e., energetic masking) and noise interference with more central cognitive aspects of speech processing (i.e., informational masking). Finally, we point out the adverse effects of age-related hearing loss and/or cognitive decline on auditory selective inhibition. With this perspective article, we set the stage for future studies on the inhibitory role of alpha oscillations for speech processing in challenging listening situations.

The present study investigates the effect of hearing loss in older listeners on the neural tracking of competing speech. Interestingly, we observed that whereas internal degradation (hearing loss) relates to the neural tracking of ignored speech, external sound degradation (ratio between attended and ignored speech; signal-to-noise ratio) relates to tracking of attended speech. This provides the first evidence for hearing loss affecting the ability to neurally track speech.