Mastoidectomy may be the most definitive treatment available; however, reviewed data suggest that conservative treatment alone has high efficacy as first-line treatment in uncomplicated cases of acute mastoiditis, and conservative therapy may be an appropriate first-line management when treating acute mastoiditis.
Background: Laryngeal cleft (LC) poses a diagnostic challenge due to its rarity and non-specific clinical features. There is poor consensus regarding management as either conservative or surgical management may be appropriate for type 1 LC, given the spectrum of disease patients present with. The objective was to review the current literature and propose diagnostic and management pathways for type 1 LC. Methods: The study comprised a systematic review using data collected from PubMed, Medline and Cochrane library. A quality assessment of included studies was performed using a validated tool. A metaanalysis of proportions was performed for the outcome of each treatment modality using MedCalc software. Results: Of 674 potential studies, 19 were included. Complete resolution rates of conservative management, injection augmentation and endoscopic surgery were 52.3% (95% CI, 32.3-71.9%), 69.2% (95% CI, 59.1-78.1%) and 65.4% (95% CI, 49.1-80.1%) respectively. There are research survey, diagnostic and treatment algorithms, and radiological investigations presented in the literature to assist in constructing an updated management algorithm. Conclusions: We recommend that all patients receive initial 3-month trial of conservative therapy. Endoscopic surgery may be considered if conservative management fails or in the presence of other surgical indications. Injection augmentation may be performed prior to definitive surgical repair in selected patients who have comorbidities that increase aspiration risk to evaluate the potential effect of surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.