An underdeveloped country like India is marked by the presence of a considerable degree of unevenness in the pattern of growth among various regions. However, till now, most of the studies failed to consider the welfare implications of such a differential growth pattern. This article attempts to analyze such welfare aspects of growth by using Kakwani's (1997) growth parameters. Based on the aggregated state-level data on area, production and yield on some major crops (viz., rice, wheat and foodgrains) in India, the study reveals considerable variations in statewise growth rates. It is observed that there is a diminishing returns to scale in operation which slows down the growth rate of the leading states. However, the less-developed states have not been able to catch up adequately over time. The result is also supported by the periodization analysis as suggested by Kakwani (1997). The study concludes that the growth of agriculture over the last 50 years after Indian Independence has been highly unequal. The new policy changes have failed to bring about a shift in this pattern so as to enhance the economic well-being of the people. Acknowledgement: The authors would like to thank but not implicate an anonymous referee for comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the article.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.