Background: Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) is a persistent liver disease. Ursodeoxycholic acid is used as a first-line treatment for the past two decades. However, concurrent use of Ursodeoxycholic acid reported with a severe adverse drug reaction. Obeticholic acid has been started utilizing as monotherapy and also with Ursodeoxycholic acid in a patient who is intolerant to Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. We primarily aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic & toxicity profiles of Ursodeoxycholic acid and Obeticholic acid using in silico methods.
Method: The pharmacokinetic profile of UDCA & OCA was observed from PKCSM server online database, OSIRIS® property Explorer, T.E.S.T. (Toxicity estimation software tool) & Molinspiration® is used to estimate the drug toxicity profiles.
Result: This computer-aided response provides a great understanding and creates a gap between the theoretical and clinical evidence for UDCA & OCA's preference in PBC management.
Conclusion: Co-administration of Obeticholic acid with Ursodeoxycholic acid will be an effective treatment for PBC in patients with UDCA intolerants. However, both medications are well-recognized substrates of the CYP3A4 enzyme and may lead to unintended drug interactions and side effects.
Keywords: Primary Biliary Cholangitis, Obeticholic acid, Ursodeoxycholic acid, CYP3A4, Drug Interactions, Pharmacokinetics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.