Background:Dexmedetomidine and clonidine have been used for the prevention and treatment of shivering following spinal blockade. A prospective randomized, double-blinded study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and clonidine in controlling postspinal shivering.Methods:A total of sixty participants of equal sex, aged between 18 and 60 years of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II Class, who underwent orthopedic lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia with ≥Grade III shivering were randomly divided into two groups, Group D (n = 30) received injection dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg and Group C (n = 30) received injection clonidine 1 μg/kg when they experienced shivering. Time taken to control shivering, response rate, recurrence rate, and side effects such as nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, respiratory depression, and deep sedation were observed.Results:The demographic profile, ASA Class, duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, temperature, onset and grade of shivering were all comparable between the two groups. Time taken to control shivering and recurrence rate were significantly lower in Group D when compared with Group C. Level of sedation was adequate with Group D, and the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia were significantly higher in Group C. The other side effects profiles were comparable between the two groups.Conclusion:Dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg is more efficient than clonidine 1 μg/kg in controlling postspinal blockade shivering. Dexmedetomidine has early onset of effect, high response rate, and less recurrence rate with added advantage of good sedation and stable cardiorespiratory parameters.

Background and Aim:Physiological changes during pregnancy and the sympatho adrenalstimulation during larynoscopy and intubation leads to evaluation of safe devices to secure airway during cesarean section under general anesthesia. I-gel, recently emerging effective supra glottic device found safe during general anesthesia in cesarean section. Aim of the study is to compare the hemodynamic disturbances and airway related complications of I-gel and Endotracheal tube in patients undergoing cesarean section under general anesthesia.Material and Methods:Eighty ASA II pregnant patients posted for elective LSCS were randomly divided into two groups of 40 each (n = 40). According to the group they were inserted either I-gel (Group I) or ETT (Group E). Insertion time, ease of intubation, hemodynamics during insertion and Extubation, airway related complications like sore throat, blood on the device, dysphagia, regurgitation, nausea, vomiting, aspiration and laryngospasm were noted and compared. Statistical analysis was done by using unpaired t test, chi square test and fisher's test. P value of <0.05 was considered as significant.Results:The demographic parameters, ease of insertion, insertion times and adequacy of ventilation were comparable between the groups (P > 0.05). 8 out of 40 patients in Group E had difficult intubation (P < 0.01). More than 20% of rise in MAP and HR were found during intubation and Extubation in Group E (40 out of 40 patients) which was statistically significant when compared to Group I (P < 0.001). Post operative sore throat significantly high in Group E (30 out of 40) (P < 0.001) when compared to Group I (4 out of 40).Conclusion:Easier insertion with less hemodynamic disturbances and very low incidence of sore throat I-gel found to be safer device to secure the airway in patients undergoing LSCS under general anesthesia.