Background: Most studies on improving hand hygiene compliance (HHC) focus on clinical wards. The 5 Moments of Hand Hygiene, as stated by the WHO, are less easy to identify in an outpatient setting or procedure rooms. Therefore, observing compliance of these moments in an outpatient clinic or among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the operating room (OR), is far more difficult. Nonetheless, proper hand hygiene in the OR is of utmost importance to prevent postoperative wound infection. Objective: We developed and implement a scoring instrument with simplified moments of hand hygiene for nonsterile HCWs in the OR. Methods: All 13 hospitals of the Antibiotic Resistance Network Southwest Netherlands were asked to submit their guidelines on hand hygiene in the OR. These guidelines were, after discussion, combined into 1 guideline, describing different hand hygiene areas for different groups of nonsterile HCWs in the OR. After asking for feedback and incorporating these adjustments, the guideline was converted into a policy document. Based on this document, a paper scoring instrument was developed to observe HHC in the OR in a uniform way across all hospitals. The Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Erasmus MC) acted as a pilot hospital where the implementation of the scoring instrument was studied. Results: The policy document has been approved by the infection committees of all 13 hospitals. The preliminary data of the pilot in the Erasmus MC, although still ongoing, are as follows. Hand hygiene in the OR was observed at 4 different time points. The anesthetist was observed once during 4 procedures in 3 different ORs. At the other 3 time points, the OR assistants (ie, OR nurses and circulating nurses) were observed during 4 procedures in 4 different ORs. Hand hygiene moments were easy to identify; the paper scoring instrument could be used to record observations of HHC in the OR. Conclusions: The guideline with the simplified moments of hand hygiene for nonsterile HCWs in the OR has been successfully implemented. The pilot test in the Erasmus MC already showed that, after defining the hand hygiene moments in the OR, the HHC in the OR is easier to observe and record using the scoring instrument. Moreover, the instrument has provided clarity for HCWs regarding the moments ate which they should disinfect their hands.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Background: Isolation precautions are recommended when caring for patients identified with highly resistant microorganisms (HRMOs). However, the direct costs of isolating patients are largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to obtain detailed information on the daily direct costs associated with isolating patients identified with HRMO. Methods: This study was performed from November until December 2017 on a 12-bed surgical ward. This ward contained solely isolation rooms with an anteroom. The daily direct costs of isolation were based on three cost items: (1) additional personal protective equipment (PPE); measured by counting the consumption of empty packaging materials, (2) cleaning and disinfection of the isolation room; based on the costs of an outsourced cleaning company, and (3) additional workload for healthcare workers; based on literature and multiplied by the average gross hourly salary of nurses. A distinction was made between the costs for strict isolation, contact-plus isolation, and contact isolation. Results: During the study period, 26 patients were nursed in isolation because of HRMO carriage, resulting in a total of 304 isolation days (median 7 isolation days; range 1-44). Gloves were consumed the most and hair caps the least. The average daily direct costs of isolation were the least expensive for contact isolation, €28/$31, and the most expensive for strict isolation, €41/$47. Conclusions: By using a novel, easy method to estimate consumption of PPE, we conclude that the daily direct costs of isolating a patient, differs per type of isolation. Insight into the direct costs of isolation is of utmost importance when developing or revising policies.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.