No abstract

A sense of belonging in a particular context is cued not only by the people in the role but by the affordances of the role—that is, the opportunities for goal pursuit. We investigate this role-based belonging in four studies documenting that the perceived affordances of social roles inform sense of belonging and convey known benefits of belonging. Perceiving more communal opportunities in naturalistic science, technology, engineering, and mathematic (STEM) settings was associated with heightened belonging in those roles (Studies 1–2). Experimentally manipulating collaborative activities in a science lab increased anticipated belonging in the lab and fostered interest, particularly among women (Study 3). Finally, mentally simulating communal affordances in a role promoted recovery from belonging threat: Considering communal opportunities in STEM facilitated recovery of STEM-specific belonging after recalling exclusion in STEM (Study 4). Investigations of role-based belonging offer the potential for both theoretical and practical advances.

The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanism of fall risk in community-dwelling ambulatory hemiplegic stroke survivors when exposed to a sudden, trip-like support surface perturbation in standing. Participants (n = 14 / group) included stroke survivors, Age-similar older controls (AC), and Young controls (YC) experienced trip-like perturbation on a motorized treadmill. The primary outcomes were COM state control (measured as COM position (X COM/BOS ) and velocity (V COM/BOS ) relative to the base of support (BOS)) and the vertical limb support recorded as the extent of hip descent. All participants demonstrated forward loss of balance (FLOB) followed by an equal first compensatory step length. At step touchdown, stroke survivors demonstrated lower COM state stability and increased trunk flexion than the YC group. Stroke survivors also demonstrated greater hip descent than YC and AC groups, as they first stepped with their non-paretic limb. For the second compensatory step, the stroke survivors stepped with their paretic limb. However, unlike the AC group, they were unable to control V COM/BOS despite a longer compensatory step. In conclusion, poor control of COM state, impaired trunk control and inability of the paretic limb to provide vertical limb support may explain the higher fall-risk in stroke survivors.

The history of male dominance in organizational hierarchy can leave a residue of mistrust in which women in particular do not expect fair treatment. The mere presence of a female leader relative to a male leader led perceivers to anticipate fairer treatment in that organization (Study 1) and greater projected salary and status (Study 2). This mere presence effect occurred uniquely through communal and not agentic affordances; these patterns emerged especially or only for women. Female leaders cued organizational trust in both male- and female-dominated industries (Study 3) and when they occupied different levels of the organizational hierarchy (Study 4). When information about organizational communal affordances is directly communicated, both female and male leaders signal trust (Study 5). The processes and practices of male-dominated organizational culture can leave a residue of mistrust, but viewing women in leadership is one beacon illuminating paths forward and upward.

The current research examined whether life sciences vs. engineering/physical sciences vary in the visibility and value of communality and agency. Overall, we find an emphasis on agency in engineering/physical sciences and a greater balance between communality and agency in the life sciences. We examine motivational culture as represented in environmental structures (Study 1), in signals sent and received in academic displays (Studies 2A-B), and in individual-level motives and cognitions (Studies 3-4). Study 1 analyzed archival course data to find that courses (N = 11,222) in engineering/physical sciences included fewer collaborative assignments than courses in life sciences. Study 2A's content analysis documented that bulletin boards (N = 68) in engineering/ physical sciences academic buildings conveyed less communal purpose, and Study 2B found that participants (N = 44) perceived greater communal purpose when viewing novel bulletin boards experimentally manipulated to include the cues identified in Study 2A. In Studies 3 (N = 326) and 4 (N = 110), engineering/physical science majors reported a strong agentic focus, compared to life science majors' more balanced focus. Further, the strong agentic focus of engineering/physical science students waned over time. This investigation of motivational cultures highlights the daily practices and institutional contexts that can shape individual-level motives and cognition related to engagement in STEM, both within and across different STEM pathways.