The need for a reliable and accurate method to quantify dystrophin proteins in human skeletal muscle biopsies has become crucial in order to assess the efficacy of dystrophin replacement therapies in Duchenne muscular dystrophy as well as to gain insight into the relationship between dystrophin levels and disease severity in Becker's muscular dystrophy. Current methods to measure dystrophin such as western blot and immunofluorescence, while straightforward and simple, lack precision and sometimes specificity. Here, we standardized a targeted mass spectrometry method to determine the absolute amount of dystrophin in ng/mg of muscle using full‐length 13C6–Arg– and 13C6,15N2–Lys–labeled dystrophin and parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). The method was found to be reproducible with a limit of quantification as low as 30 pg of dystrophin protein per mg of total muscle proteins. The method was then tested to measure levels of dystrophin in muscle biopsies from a healthy donor and from Duchenne and Becker's muscular dystrophy patients.

Background: Myogenesis is a dynamic process involving temporal changes in the expression of many genes. Lack of dystrophin protein such as in Duchenne muscular dystrophy might alter the natural course of gene expression dynamics during myogenesis. Objective: To gain insight into the dynamic temporal changes in protein expression during differentiation of normal and dystrophin deficient myoblasts to myotubes. Method: A super SILAC spike-in strategy in combination and LC-MS/MS was used for temporal proteome profiling of normal and dystrophin deficient myoblasts during differentiation. The acquired data was analyzed using Proteome Discoverer 2.2. and data clustering using R to define significant temporal changes in protein expression. Results: sFour major temporal protein clusters that showed sequential dynamic expression profiles during myogenesis of normal myoblasts were identified. Clusters 1 and 2, consisting mainly of proteins involved mRNA splicing and processing expression, were elevated at days 0 and 0.5 of differentiation then gradually decreased by day 7 of differentiation, then remained lower thereafter. Cluster 3 consisted of proteins involved contractile muscle and actomyosin organization. They increased in their expression reaching maximum at day 7 of differentiation then stabilized thereafter. Cluster 4 consisting of proteins involved in skeletal muscle development glucogenesis and extracellular remodeling had a lower expression during myoblast stage then gradually increased in their expression to reach a maximum at days 11–15 of differentiation. Lack of dystrophin expression in DMD muscle myoblast caused major alteration in temporal expression of proteins involved in cell adhesion, cytoskeleton, and organelle organization as well as the ubiquitination machinery. Conclusion: Time series proteome profiling using super SILAC strategy is a powerful method to assess temporal changes in protein expression during myogenesis and to define the downstream consequences of lack of dystrophin on these temporal protein expressions. Key alterations were identified in dystrophin deficient myoblast differentiation compared to normal myoblasts. These alterations could be an attractive therapeutic target.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive muscle disease involving complex skeletal muscle pathogenesis. The pathogenesis is triggered by sarcolemma instability due to the lack of dystrophin protein expression, leading to Ca2+ influx, muscle fiber apoptosis, inflammation, muscle necrosis, and fibrosis. Our lab recently used two high-throughput multiplexing techniques (e.g., SomaScan® aptamer assay and tandem mass tag-(TMT) approach) and identified a series of serum protein biomarkers tied to different pathobiochemical pathways. In this study, we focused on validating the circulating levels of three proinflammatory chemokines (CCL2, CXCL10, and CCL18) that are believed to be involved in an early stage of muscle pathogenesis. We used highly specific and reproducible MSD ELISA assays and examined the association of these chemokines with DMD pathogenesis, age, disease severity, and response to glucocorticoid treatment. As expected, we confirmed that these three chemokines were significantly elevated in serum and muscle samples of DMD patients relative to age-matched healthy controls (p-value < 0.05, CCL18 was not significantly altered in muscle samples). These three chemokines were not significantly elevated in Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) patients, a milder form of dystrophinopathy, when compared in a one-way ANOVA to a control group but remained significantly elevated in the age-matched DMD group (p < 0.05). CCL2 and CCL18 but not CXCL10 declined with age in DMD patients, whereas all three chemokines remained unchanged with age in BMD and controls. Only CCL2 showed significant association with time to climb four steps in the DMD group (r = 0.48, p = 0.038) and neared significant association with patients’ reported outcome in the BMD group (r = 0.39, p = 0.058). Furthermore, CCL2 was found to be elevated in a serum of the mdx mouse model of DMD, relative to wild-type mouse model. This study suggests that CCL2 might be a suitable candidate biomarker for follow-up studies to demonstrate its physiological significance and clinical utility in DMD.

No abstract