Recently, all-dielectric metasurfaces (AMs) have emerged as a promising platform for high-efficiency devices ranging from the terahertz to optical ranges. However, active and fast tuning of their properties, such as amplitude, phase, and operating frequency, remains challenging. Here, a generic method is proposed for obtaining high-efficiency active AMs from the terahertz to optical ranges by using "hybrid structures" integrated with phase-change materials. Various phase-change mechanisms including metal−insulator phase change, nonvolatile phase change, and ferroelectric phase change are investigated. We first experimentally demonstrate several high-efficiency active AMs operating in the terahertz range based on hybrid structures composed of free-standing silicon microstructures covered with ultrathin phase-change nanofilms (thickness d ≪ λ). We show that both the frequencies and the strength of the Mie resonances can be efficiently tuned, resulting in unprecedented modulation depth. Furthermore, detailed analyses of available phase-change materials and their properties are provided to offer more options for active AMs. Finally, several feasible hybrid structures for active AMs in the optical range are proposed and confirmed numerically. The broad platform built in this work for active manipulation of waves from the terahertz to optical ranges may have numerous potential applications in optical devices including switches, modulators, and sensors.

No abstract

This up-to-date meta-analysis reveals that the 3D display system is superior to the 2D system in clinical settings with significantly shorter operating time, less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. These findings suggest that, in laparoscopic or thoracoscopic surgeries, 3D endoscopic system is preferable when condition permits. Future efforts should be made on decreasing the side effects of 3D display and increasing its cost-effectiveness.

Background The addition of chemotherapy to a programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitor is a more effective option as a first‐line treatment for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It might also inhibit an overactive immune response and thereby reduce immune‐related adverse events (irAEs). This meta‐analysis assessed the rate of irAEs with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (I+C) versus a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor alone (I) and evaluated the indirect relative risk (RR) of I+C versus I. Methods The protocol of this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020139923). The pooled rates of irAEs at different grades were calculated by a single‐arm meta‐analysis weighted by sample size, and RRs were determined by direct meta‐analysis and indirect treatment comparison. Results Overall, I+C had a lower rate of grade 3 or higher irAEs than I (7.1% vs 10.6%; indirect RR, 0.516; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.291‐0.916), although irAEs of any grade were similar. The rate of pneumonitis with I+C was lower than the rate with I for any grade (5.9% vs 7.1%; indirect RR, 0.217; 95% CI, 0.080‐0.588) and for grade 3 or higher. In the endocrine system, I+C was associated with a lower overall ratein comparison with I (16.1% vs 20.1%; indirect RR, 0.260; 95% CI, 0.120‐0.564), whereas irAEs of the digestive system were similar with I+C and I. In other systems, I+C decreased the rate of skin reactions, including rash, in comparison with I (10.4% vs 12.9%; indirect RR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.299‐0.751). The rate of grade 3 or higher skin reactions (excluding rash) also decreased with I+C versus I (1.1% vs 2.0%) with an indirect RR of 0.158 (95% CI, 0.032‐0.765), whereas other included irAEs were similar. Conclusions In comparison with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor alone, a combination with chemotherapy for the first‐line treatment of NSCLC decreased the rates of most irAEs, such as pneumonitis and endocrine and skin reactions, and the overall rate. Lay Summary In the first‐line treatment of advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the addition of chemotherapy to a programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐(L)1) inhibitor is a more effective option. Adding chemotherapy might reduce immune‐related adverse events (irAEs). Thus, this article assesses the rate of irAEs with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (I+C) in comparison with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor alone (I) and evaluates the indirect relative risk (RR) with I+C versus I. The key finding is that in comparison with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor alone, a combination with chemotherapy for the first‐line treatment of NSCLC decreases the rates of most irAEs, such as pneumonitis and endocrine and skin reactions, and the overall rate.