Energy, exergy and economic analysis are proposed herein to evaluate regasification systems in Floating Storage Regasification Units (FSRUs). Three regasification systems typical in these types of vessels are considered: seawater system, open loop propane system and closed loop water-glycol system. The energy and exergy analyses were performed using the Engineering Equation Solver (EES), while Suite AspenONE programmes were used for the economic assessment. The exergy analysis provides a better understanding of the components of physical exergy (thermal and mechanical exergy) in order to define an exergy efficiency applicable to any liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification system or FSRU. The results obtained prove the seawater regasification system to be most efficient from an energy and exergy standpoint. The specific energy consumption and exergy efficiency for this system are 227.33 kJ/kg and 50.00%, respectively. On the other hand, the open loop propane regasification system is most cost-effective for an LNG price between 1.32 and 11 USD/MMBtu. The vast amounts of destroyed exergy in the regasification process of current systems was also demonstrated and hence the need to develop new, more efficient configurations that could exploit the cold energy of LNG.
This paper aims to review regasification technology installed in Floating Storage Regasification Units (FSRUs) and the potential offered by the exploitation of cold energy from liquefied natural gas (LNG) in these vessels. The assessment describes the main characteristics of regasification systems along with their respective advantages and limitations. Regasification systems in direct exchange (seawater and steam) and systems with intermediate fluids that use propane or water-glycol in the heat transfer process are studied. In recent years, water-glycol systems have cornered the market. The mixture, besides reducing the risk of freezing, is non-flammable, economical and highly available. Thermodynamic analysis of the regasification process shows that LNG cold energy is the main source of residual energy in these vessels; the specific energy and exergy content is more than double that of engine exhaust gases. Exploitation of this cold energy in power cycles could significantly reduce FSRUs harmful emissions and electrical energy could even be exported to shore. The organic Rankine cycle technology is the most well-known and widely studied, although scientific literature is scarce and there is a need to propose new regasification systems with cold energy exploitation that can be adopted on these vessels.
The present study provides an energy, exergy and economic analysis of a seawater regasification system (open loop) combining stages of simple organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) arranged in series with an open organic Rankine cycle (OC) in order to exploit the cold energy of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The proposed system, termed ORC-OC, is implemented in a Floating Storage Regasification Unit (FSRU) to achieve the objective of zero greenhouse emissions during the regasification process. Configurations of up to three stages of ORCs and the use of zeotropic mixtures of ethane/propane and n-butane/propane as working fluids are considered in the study of the novel regasification system. Only the two-stage ORC-OC (2ORC-OC) and three-stage (3ORC-OC) configurations accomplish the objective of zero emissions, attaining exergy efficiencies of 61.80% and 62.04%, respectively. The overall cost rate of the latter, however, is 20.85% greater, so the 2ORC-OC results as being more cost-effective. A comparison with conventional regasification systems installed on board shows that the 2ORC-OC yields a lower total cost rate if the LNG price exceeds 8.903 USD/MMBtu. This value could be reduced, however, if the electrical power that exceeds the FSRU’s demand is exported and if compact heat exchangers are implemented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.