The public health system has restricted economic resources. Because of that, it is necessary to know how the resources are being used and if they are properly distributed. Several works have applied classical approaches based in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) for this purpose. However, if we have hospitals with different casemix, this is not the best approach. In order to avoid biases in the comparisons, other works have recommended the use of hospital production data corrected by the weights from Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), to adjust the casemix of hospitals. However, not all countries have this tool fully implemented, which limits the efficiency evaluation. This paper proposes a new approach for evaluating the efficiency of hospitals. It uses a graph-based clustering algorithm to find groups of hospitals that have similar production profiles. Then, DEA is used to evaluate the technical efficiency of each group. The proposed approach is tested using the production data from 2014 of 193 Chilean public hospitals. The results allowed to identify different performance profiles of each group, that differs from other studies that employs data from partially implemented DRGs. Our results are able to deliver a better description of the resource management of the different groups of hospitals. We have created a website with the results ( bioinformatic.diinf.usach.cl/publichealth ). Data can be requested to the authors.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Massive sequencing projects executed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have revealed in detail its population structure. The recent “1002 yeast genomes project” has become the most complete catalogue of yeast genetic diversity and a powerful resource to analyse the evolutionary history of genes affecting specific phenotypes. In this work, we selected 22 nitrogen associated genes and analysed the sequence information from the 1011 strains of the “1002 yeast genomes project”. We constructed a total evidence (TE) phylogenetic tree using concatenated information, which showed a 27% topology similarity with the reference (REF) tree of the “1002 yeast genomes project”. We also generated individual phylogenetic trees for each gene and compared their topologies, identifying genes with similar topologies (suggesting a shared evolutionary history). Furthermore, we pruned the constructed phylogenetic trees to compare the REF tree topology versus the TE tree and the individual genes trees, considering each phylogenetic cluster/subcluster within the population, observing genes with cluster/subcluster topologies of high similarity to the REF tree. Finally, we used the pruned versions of the phylogenetic trees to compare four strains considered as representatives of S. cerevisiae clean lineages, observing for 15 genes that its cluster topologies match 100% the REF tree, supporting that these strains represent main lineages of yeast population. Altogether, our results showed the potential of tree topologies comparison for exploring the evolutionary history of a specific group of genes.