Background: A number of studies have shown that peptidases and in particular cysteine peptidases constitute major pathogenicity factors in Entamoeba histolytica. Recent studies have suggested that a considerable number of genes coding for proteolytic enzymes are present within the E. histolytica genome and questions remain about the mode of expression of the various molecules.
BackgroundThe availability of two genetically very similar cell lines (A and B) derived from the laboratory isolate Entamoeba histolytica HM-1:IMSS, which differ in their virulence properties, provides a powerful tool for identifying pathogenicity factors of the causative agent of human amoebiasis. Cell line A is incapable inducing liver abscesses in gerbils, whereas interaction with cell line B leads to considerable abscess formation. Phenotypic characterization of both cell lines revealed that trophozoites from the pathogenic cell line B have a larger cell size, an increased growth rate in vitro, an increased cysteine peptidase activity and higher resistance to nitric oxide stress. To find proteins that may serve as virulence factors, the proteomes of both cell lines were previously studied, resulting in the identification of a limited number of differentially synthesized proteins. This study aims to identify additional genes, serving as virulence factors, or virulence markers.ResultsTo obtain a comprehensive picture of the differences between the cell lines, we compared their transcriptomes using an oligonucleotide-based microarray and confirmed findings with quantitative real-time PCR. Out of 6242 genes represented on the array, 87 are differentially transcribed (≥two-fold) in the two cell lines. Approximately 50% code for hypothetical proteins. Interestingly, only 19 genes show a five-fold or higher differential expression. These include three rab7 GTPases, which were found with a higher abundance in the non-pathogenic cell line A. The aig1-like GTPasesare of special interest because the majority of them show higher levels of transcription in the pathogenic cell line B. Only two molecules were found to be differentially expressed between the two cell lines in both this study and our previous proteomic approach.ConclusionsIn this study we have identified a defined set of genes that are differentially transcribed between the non-pathogenic cell line A and the pathogenic cell line B of E. histolytica. The identification of transcription profiles unique for amoebic cell lines with pathogenic phenotypes may help to elucidate the transcriptional framework of E. histolytica pathogenicity and serve as a basis for identifying transcriptional markers and virulence factors.
SummaryCysteine peptidases of Entamoeba histolytica (EhCPs) are considered to be important pathogenicity factors. It has been described that under standard axenic culture conditions, only three (ehcp-a1, ehcp-a2 and ehcp-a5) out of approximately 50 cysteine peptidase genes present in the E. histolytica genome are substantially expressed, thus representing the set of major EhCPs. In this study, transcriptional silencing of the major peptidase genes was used to characterize their physiological role in more detail. Analysing the transfectants a fourth major cysteine peptidase activity belonging to EhCP-A7 could be characterized. Neither cytopathic activity nor phagocytosis of erythrocytes was altered in CP-inactivated amoebae. However, a significant difference in haemolytic activity was observed. EhCP-A1 and EhCP-A7 apparently had no influence on haemolytic activity, whereas transfectants silenced for ehcp-a5 as well as those silenced for all major peptidases showed a significant reduction in their haemolytic activity. Furthermore, cells silenced for ehcp-a1 and ehcp-a7 and more effectively cells silenced in all major ehcps were impaired in digesting of phagocytosed erythrocytes. Moreover, amoebae silenced for all major peptidase genes lost the ability to form aggregates of erythrocytes prior to phagocytosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.