The objective of this study was to compare the flexural strength and elasticity modulus of two types of staple reinforcement fibers, Interlig - Angelus/glass (Londrina, PR, Brazil) and Connect - KerrLab(R)/polyethylene (MFG Co., West Collins Orange, CA, USA), which are widely used in Dentistry for chairside use, after varying the number of layers employed and submitting or not to thermocycling. This study was performed on 72 specimens, divided into 8 groups: G1 - single layer of Interlig fibers without thermocycling; G2 - double layer of Interlig fibers without thermocycling; G3 - single layer of Interlig fibers with thermocycling; and G4 - double layer of Interlig fibers with thermocycling; G5 - single layer of Connect fibers without termocycling; G6 - double layer of Connect fibers without termocycling; G7 - single layer of Connect fibers with termocycling; G8 - double layer of Connect fibers with termocycling. For each group, values for flexural strength and elasticity modulus were obtained. The polyethylene fiber employed in a double layer presented the highest flexural strength (p < 0.05), independently of thermocycling (p < 0.001), when compared to the other evaluated combinations. The polyethylene fiber, used in a single layer without thermocycling, demonstrated a significantly higher elasticity modulus, when compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it was concluded that the polyethylene fiber in a double layer appears to be more resistant, regardless of whether it was submitted to thermocycling or not.

The objective of this experience report is to draw a comparison between the adjustments made in the Welcoming, in a Family Health Unit or FHU in the city of Recife, Pernambuco, from March 2020 to March 2023. The initial phase of this study comprised a descriptive and qualitative approach to the experiences, particularly directed to the welcoming of users. This one was from 37 professionals from the FHU of Vila União, in the city of Recife, State of Pernambuco. The professionals belonged to four Family Health teams. Considering the data obtained in the first half of 2021, the dynamics of welcoming were directed to screening, with little participation of the Oral Health team and problems related to dissatisfaction with the solution established for their problem. It was observed the need for adjustments in welcoming, with a view to a better level of satisfaction for both users and the care team. After an interval of two years or 24 months, it was found that there were few changes. The established organization remains with the Community Health Agent or CHA, triaging and referring users, with the Oral Health team being away from the reception and taking turns with another team. In this context, the current direction seems to reflect a recovery in the demand for care, not necessarily the quality of care. What has been found to be a problem is in a larger dimension, but is not discussed, at least until the month of March 2023.