Shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) allows a plant grown in a densely populated environment to maximize opportunities to access to sunlight. Although it is well established that SAS is accompanied by gene expression changes, the underlying molecular mechanism needs to be elucidated. Here, we identify the H3K4me3/H3K36me3-binding proteins, Morf Related Gene (MRG) group proteins MRG1 and MRG2, as positive regulators of shade-induced hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). MRG2 binds PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR7 (PIF7) and regulates the expression of several common downstream target genes, including YUCCA8 and IAA19 involved in the auxin biosynthesis or response pathway and PRE1 involved in brassinosteroid regulation of cell elongation. In response to shade, PIF7 and MRG2 are enriched at the promoter and gene-body regions and are necessary for increase of histone H4 and H3 acetylation to promote target gene expression. Our study uncovers a mechanism in which the shade-responsive factor PIF7 recruits MRG1/MRG2 that binds H3K4me3/H3K36me3 and brings histone-acetylases to induce histone acetylations to promote expression of shade responsive genes, providing thus a molecular mechanistic link coupling the environmental light to epigenetic modification in regulation of hypocotyl elongation in plant SAS.

Summary Day‐length changes represent an important cue for modulating flowering time. In Arabidopsis, the expression of the florigen gene FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) exhibits a 24‐h circadian rhythm under long‐day (LD) conditions. Here we focus on the chromatin‐based mechanism regarding the control of FT expression. We conducted co‐immunoprecipitation assays along with LC‐MS/MS analysis and identified HD2C histone deacetylase as the binding protein of the H3K4/H3K36 methylation reader MRG2. HD2C and MRG1/2 regulate flowering time under LD conditions, but not under short‐day conditions. Moreover, HD2C functions as an effective deacetylase in planta, mainly targeting H3K9ac, H3K23ac and H3K27ac. At dusk, HD2C is recruited to FT to deacetylate histones and repress transcription in an MRG1/2‐dependent manner. More importantly, HD2C competes with CO for the binding of MRG2, and the accumulation of HD2C at the FT locus occurs at the end of the day. Our findings not only reveal a histone deacetylation mechanism contributing to prevent FT overexpression and precocious flowering, but also support the model in which the histone methylation readers MRG1/2 provide a platform on chromatin for connecting regulatory factors involved in activating FT expression in response to daylight and decreasing FT expression around dusk under long days.

BackgroundIntron retention (IR), the most prevalent alternative splicing form in plants, plays a critical role in gene expression during plant development and stress response. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying IR regulation remain largely unknown.ResultsKnockdown of SDG725, a histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36)-specific methyltransferase in rice, leads to alterations of IR in more than 4700 genes. Surprisingly, IR events are globally increased at the 5′ region but decreased at the 3′ region of the gene body in the SDG725-knockdown mutant. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analyses reveal that SDG725 depletion results in a genome-wide increase of the H3K36 mono-methylation (H3K36me1) but, unexpectedly, promoter-proximal shifts of H3K36 di- and tri-methylation (H3K36me2 and H3K36me3). Consistent with the results in animals, the levels of H3K36me1/me2/me3 in rice positively correlate with gene expression levels, whereas shifts of H3K36me2/me3 coincide with position-specific alterations of IR. We find that either H3K36me2 or H3K36me3 alone contributes to the positional change of IR caused by SDG725 knockdown, although IR shift is more significant when both H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 modifications are simultaneously shifted.ConclusionsOur results revealed that SDG725 modulates IR in a position-specific manner, indicating that H3K36 methylation plays a role in RNA splicing, probably by marking the retained introns in plants.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12915-018-0513-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

METTL4 belongs to a subclade of MT-A70 family members of methyltransferase (MTase) proteins shown to mediate N6-adenosine methylation for both RNA and DNA in diverse eukaryotes. Here, we report that Arabidopsis METTL4 functions as U2 snRNA MTase for N6−2’-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am) in vivo that regulates flowering time, and specifically catalyzes N6-methylation of 2’-O-methyladenosine (Am) within a single-stranded RNA in vitro. The apo structures of full-length Arabidopsis METTL4 bound to S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) and the complex structure with an Am-containing RNA substrate, combined with mutagenesis and in vitro enzymatic assays, uncover a preformed L-shaped, positively-charged cavity surrounded by four loops for substrate binding and a catalytic center composed of conserved residues for specific Am nucleotide recognition and N6-methylation activity. Structural comparison of METTL4 with the mRNA m6A enzyme METTL3/METTL14 heterodimer and modeling analysis suggest a catalytic mechanism for N6-adenosine methylation by METTL4, which may be shared among MT-A70 family members.

Summary Histones are highly basic proteins involved in packaging DNA into chromatin, and histone modifications are fundamental in epigenetic regulation in eukaryotes. Among the numerous chromatin modifiers identified in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), MORF‐RELATED GENE (MRG)1 and MRG2 have redundant functions in reading histone H3 lysine 36 trimethylation (H3K36me3). Here, we show that MRG2 binds histone chaperones belonging to the NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN 1 (NAP1) family, including NAP1‐RELATED PROTEIN (NRP)1 and NRP2. Characterization of the loss‐of‐function mutants mrg1 mrg2, nrp1 nrp2 and mrg1 mrg2 nrp1 nrp2 revealed that MRG1/MRG2 and NRP1/NRP2 regulate flowering time through fine‐tuning transcription of floral genes by distinct molecular mechanisms. In particular, the physical interaction between NRP1/NRP2 and MRG1/MRG2 inhibited the binding of MRG1/MRG2 to the transcription factor CONSTANS (CO), leading to a transcriptional repression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) through impeded H4K5 acetylation (H4K5ac) within the FT chromatin. By contrast, NRP1/NRP2 and MRG1/MRG2 act together, likely in a multiprotein complex manner, in promoting the transcription of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) via an increase of both H4K5ac and H3K9ac in the FLC chromatin. Because the expression pattern of FLC represents the major category of differentially expressed genes identified by genome‐wide RNA‐sequencing analysis in the mrg1 mrg2, nrp1 nrp2 and mrg1 mrg2 nrp1 nrp2 mutants, it is reasonable to speculate that the NRP1/NRP2‐MRG1/MRG2 complex may be involved in transcriptional activation of genes beyond FLC and flowering time control.