This study aims to determine the utility of the narrative slope in predicting the vocational/productive outcomes of participants. For 65 participants living in supportive facilities for adults with HIV/AIDS in the United States, narrative slopes, based on the Occupational Performance History Interview II, were constructed and classified as progressive, stable, or regressive. Information regarding participants' productive activities was collected at discharge from intervention programming, and at 3-month intervals, up to 9 months. Data were analyzed to examine the relationship between narrative slope and engagement in employment and other productive activity post-intervention. Demographic variables were also analyzed. None of the demographic factors significantly correlated to outcomes. It was found that a more positive narrative slope was predictive of a higher likelihood of being employed or engaged in other productive activity.
The purpose of this study was to identify perceived barriers to independent community living and employment among clients and staff members in a transitional living facility for persons with AIDS. This qualitative study used focus groups to collect these perceptions from staff members (N = 21) and clients (N = 16). Whereas staff identified both systemic and personal barriers, clients only identified systemic barriers. These findings suggest that both clients and staff recognize the types of environmental barriers to participation that have been identified by disability scholars. The findings also underscore a consequential gap between clients' exclusive emphasis on environmental barriers and staff emphasis on clients' personal barriers that impact upon participation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.