Because it is very toxic and accumulates in organisms, particularly in fish, mercury is an important pollutant and one of the most studied. Nonetheless we still have an incomplete understanding of the factors that control the bioconcentration of mercury. Elemental mercury is efficiently transported as a gas around the globe, and even remote areas show evidence of mercury pollution originating from industrial sources such as power plants. Besides elemental mercury, the major forms of mercury in water are ionic mercury (which is bound to chloride, sulfide, or organic acids) and organic mercury, particularly methylmercury. Methylmercury rather than inorganic mercury is bioconcentrated because it is better retained by organisms at various levels in the food chain. The key factor determining the concentration of mercury in the biota is the methylmercury concentration in water, which is controlled by the relative efficiency of the methylation and demethylation processes. Anoxic waters and sediments are an important source of methylmercury, apparently as the result of the methylating activity of sulfatereducing bacteria. In surface waters, methylmercury may originate from anoxic

Abstract. It was discovered in 1995 that, during the spring time, unexpectedly low concentrations of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) occurred in the Arctic air. This was surprising for a pollutant known to have a long residence time in the atmosphere; however conditions appeared to exist in the Arctic that promoted this depletion of mercury (Hg). This phenomenon is termed atmospheric mercury depletion events (AMDEs) and its discovery has revolutionized our understanding of the cycling of Hg in Polar Regions while stimulating a significant amount of research to understand its impact to this fragile ecosystem. Shortly after the discovery was made in Canada, AMDEs were confirmed to occur throughout the Arctic, sub-Artic and Antarctic coasts. It is now known that, through a series of photochemically initiated reactions involving halogens, GEM is converted to a Correspondence to: A. Steffen (alexandra.steffen@ec.gc.ca) more reactive species and is subsequently associated to particles in the air and/or deposited to the polar environment. AMDEs are a means by which Hg is transferred from the atmosphere to the environment that was previously unknown. In this article we review Hg research taken place in Polar Regions pertaining to AMDEs, the methods used to collect Hg in different environmental media, research results of the current understanding of AMDEs from field, laboratory and modeling work, how Hg cycles around the environment after AMDEs, gaps in our current knowledge and the future impacts that AMDEs may have on polar environments. The research presented has shown that while considerable improvements in methodology to measure Hg have been made but the main limitation remains knowing the speciation of Hg in the various media. The processes that drive AMDEs and how they occur are discussed. As well, the role that the snow pack and the sea ice play in the cycling of Hg is presented. It has been found that deposition of Hg from AMDEs occurs at marine coasts and not far inland and that a fraction of the Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. deposited Hg does not remain in the same form in the snow. Kinetic studies undertaken have demonstrated that bromine is the major oxidant depleting Hg in the atmosphere. Modeling results demonstrate that there is a significant deposition of Hg to Polar Regions as a result of AMDEs. Models have also shown that Hg is readily transported to the Arctic from source regions, at times during springtime when this environment is actively transforming Hg from the atmosphere to the snow and ice surfaces. The presence of significant amounts of methyl Hg in snow in the Arctic surrounding AMDEs is important because this species is the link between the environment and impacts to wildlife and humans. Further, much work on methylation and demethylation processes has occurred but these processes are not yet fully understood. Recent changes in the climate and sea ice cover in Polar Regions are likely to have strong effects on the cycling of Hg in this envir...

Methylmercury contamination of fisheries from centuries of industrial atmospheric emissions negatively impacts humans and wildlife worldwide. The response of fish methylmercury concentrations to changes in mercury deposition has been difficult to establish because sediments/soils contain large pools of historical contamination, and many factors in addition to deposition affect fish mercury. To test directly the response of fish contamination to changing mercury deposition, we conducted a whole-ecosystem experiment, increasing the mercury load to a lake and its watershed by the addition of enriched stable mercury isotopes. The isotopes allowed us to distinguish between experimentally applied mercury and mercury already present in the ecosystem and to examine bioaccumulation of mercury deposited to different parts of the watershed. Fish methylmercury concentrations responded rapidly to changes in mercury deposition over the first 3 years of study. Essentially all of the increase in fish methylmercury concentrations came from mercury deposited directly to the lake surface. In contrast, <1% of the mercury isotope deposited to the watershed was exported to the lake. Steady state was not reached within 3 years. Lake mercury isotope concentrations were still rising in lake biota, and watershed mercury isotope exports to the lake were increasing slowly. Therefore, we predict that mercury emissions reductions will yield rapid (years) reductions in fish methylmercury concentrations and will yield concomitant reductions in risk. However, a full response will be delayed by the gradual export of mercury stored in watersheds. The rate of response will vary among lakes depending on the relative surface areas of water and watershed.bioaccumulation ͉ mercury methylation ͉ stable isotopes ͉ whole-ecosystem experimentation ͉ methylmercury

Abstract. The Arctic is a water-rich region, with freshwater systems covering about 16 % of the northern permafrost landscape. Permafrost thaw creates new freshwater ecosystems, while at the same time modifying the existing lakes, streams, and rivers that are impacted by thaw. Here, we describe the current state of knowledge regarding how permafrost thaw affects lentic (still) and lotic (moving) systems, exploring the effects of both thermokarst (thawing and collapse of ice-rich permafrost) and deepening of the active layer (the surface soil layer that thaws and refreezes each year). Within thermokarst, we further differentiate between the effects of thermokarst in lowland areas vs. that on hillslopes. For almost all of the processes that we explore, the effects of thaw vary regionally, and between lake and stream systems. Much of this regional variation is caused by differences in ground ice content, topography, soil type, and permafrost coverage. Together, these modifying factors determine (i) the degree to which permafrost thaw manifests as thermokarst, (ii) whether thermokarst leads to slumping or the formation of thermokarst lakes, and (iii) the manner in which constituent delivery to freshwater systems is altered by thaw. Differences in thaw-enabled constituent delivery can Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. J. E. Vonk et al.: Effects of permafrost thaw on Arctic aquatic ecosystemsbe considerable, with these modifying factors determining, for example, the balance between delivery of particulate vs. dissolved constituents, and inorganic vs. organic materials. Changes in the composition of thaw-impacted waters, coupled with changes in lake morphology, can strongly affect the physical and optical properties of thermokarst lakes. The ecology of thaw-impacted lakes and streams is also likely to change; these systems have unique microbiological communities, and show differences in respiration, primary production, and food web structure that are largely driven by differences in sediment, dissolved organic matter, and nutrient delivery. The degree to which thaw enables the delivery of dissolved vs. particulate organic matter, coupled with the composition of that organic matter and the morphology and stratification characteristics of recipient systems will play an important role in determining the balance between the release of organic matter as greenhouse gases (CO 2 and CH 4 ), its burial in sediments, and its loss downstream. The magnitude of thaw impacts on northern aquatic ecosystems is increasing, as is the prevalence of thaw-impacted lakes and streams. There is therefore an urgent need to quantify how permafrost thaw is affecting aquatic ecosystems across diverse Arctic landscapes, and the implications of this change for further climate warming.

Hg 0 + I 2 → HgI 2 Absolute N 2 , 1 atm 296 ± 1 < (1.27 ± 0.58) × 10 -19 Raofie et al. 2 M06-2X/aug-cc-pVTZ-PP High pressure limit 3.94 × 10 -14 T 1.06 e -159080/RT Auzmendi-Murua et al. 3 Hg 0 + I → HgI RRKM/B3LYP N 2 , 1 atm 180-400 4.0 × 10 -13 (T/298) -2.38 Goodsite et al. 4 Hg 0 + Br 2 → HgBr 2 Absolute Air, N 2 , 1 atm 298 ± 1 < (9 ± 2) × 10 -17 Ariya et al. 5 Absolute Air, 1 atm ∼298 No reaction detected Sumner et al. 6 Absolute Air, 1 atm 296 (6.0 ± 0.5) × 10 -17 Liu et al. 7 CCSD(T)/AVTZ 1 atm 298-2000 1.62 -9 e -110800/RT Wilcox and Okano 8 M06-2X/aug-cc-pVTZ-PP High pressure limit 4.70 × 10 -14 T 1.06 e -169190/RT Auzmendi-Murua et al. 3 Hg 0 + BrO → HgBrO Relative N 2 , 1 atm 298 10 -15 < k < 10 -13 Raofie and Ariya 9 Hg 0 + Br → HgBr Ab initio N/A, 1 atm 1.01 × 10 -12 e 1738/RT Khalizov et al. 10 RRKM/B3LYP N 2 , 1 atm 200-300 3.7 × 10 -13 (T/298) -2.76 Goodsite et al. 4 ; Goodsite et al. 11 Absolute N 2 , 0.26-0.79 atm 243-293 (1.46 ± 0.36) × 10 -32 [cm 6 molec -2 s -1 ] Donohoue et al. 12 (T/298) (-1.86±1.49) CCSD(T) Ar, 1 atm 260 1.2 × 10 -12 Shepler et al. 13 Relative Air, N 2 , 1 atm 298 ± 1 (3.2 ± 0.9) × 10 -12 Ariya et al. 5 Absolute CF 3 Br, 0.26 atm 397 ~3 × 10 -16 molec -1 s -1 Greig, G. et al. 14 CCSD(T)/AVTZ 1 atm 298-2000 6.64 × 10 -14 (T/298) -0.859 Wilcox and Okano HgBr + Br → HgBr 2 Absolute CF 3 Br, 0.26 atm 397 ~7 × 10 -14 Greig, G. et al. 14 RRKM/B3LYP N 2 , 1 atm 180-400 2.5 × 10 -10 (T/298) -0.57 Goodsite et al. 4 CCSD(T)/AVTZ 1 atm 298-2000 3.32 × 10 -12 (T/298) -9.18 Wilcox and Okano CCSD(T)/aVTZ 1 atm 298 6.33 × 10 -11 Dibble et al. 15 ; Wang et al.