We present herein the case of an elderly male patient, who was receiving immunotherapy for his urothelial cancer and who presented to our facility with lower extremity weakness. The patient was diagnosed with myasthenia gravis, thyroiditis, myositis and myocarditis, which were considered as immune adverse events of pembrolizumab therapy. The patient received pyridostigmine, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, corticosteroids, and rituximab with mild improvement of his symptoms. The patient had some neurological recovery, was discharged to a nursing facility, however he was ventilator dependent. Of importance, our case is followed by review and discussion of the literature related to immunotherapy and its side effects.

Introduction Starting December 2019, the world has been devastated by the rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Many risk factors have been associated with worse outcomes and death from Covid-19 pneumonia including having diabetes mellitus. To date, it is not clear if all group of diabetics share the same risk of complications with COVID-19 infection. This study aims to compare disease severity and mortality rate in insulin users versus non-insulin users. Methods In this retrospective case–control study conducted at the largest health care network in New York state, we included adult, diabetic patients admitted from March 2020 to October 2020 with Covid-19 pneumonia. We compared the baseline characteristics in addition to outcomes of diabetic patients on home insulin (cases) and non-insulin user diabetics (controls). In addition, to determine if home insulin use is associated with an increased mortality, we conducted a cox regression analysis. Results We included 696 patients in the study period with a median age of 57 years, interquartile range [IQR] 51–62, and median body mass index 29.9 (IQR: 26–34.7). The majority (476 [68%]) were males. We identified 227 cases (33%) and 469 controls (67%). More cases than controls were hypertensive (74% vs 67%, p = 0.03), on ACE/ARB (50% vs 42%, p = 0.05), and had a hemoglobin A1c > 8.1 (71% vs 44%, p < 0.001). More cases had AKI (52% vs 38%, p < 0.001), however no significant differences were found in intubation rates (26% vs 24%, p = 0.54), detection of pulmonary embolism (4% vs 6%, p = 0.19) or death rate (15% vs 11%, p = 0.22) comparing cases and controls. In a multivariate analysis, we found that home insulin use was independently associated with increased risk of death: Hazard ratio: 1.92, 95% confidence interval (1.13–3.23). Conclusion We showed herein that diabetic patients on home insulin with COVID-19 pneumonia, have worse outcomes and increased mortality compared to diabetics on oral antihyperglycemic agents. Close monitoring of insulin-dependent type II diabetic patients is needed in the current pandemic.

No abstract

Background: Traditional open sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) utilizes highly invasive techniques that lead to several serious complications. In response, minimally invasive cardiac surgery CABG (MICS-CABG) was developed. MICS-CABG is safe, reproducible, and with fewer complications, while allowing for better postoperative recovery periods. There is a paucity of data exploring rates of repeat revascularization in patients post MICS-CABG compared to post traditional sternotomy CABG.Methods: This was a retrospective billing database review examining 1468 CABG patients at a large university medical center from January 2005 to December 2017. The primary objective was to compare the rate of repeat revascularization events between MICS-CABG and traditional open sternotomy CABG over an eight-year follow-up period.Results: Our study population consisted of 1468 patients, of whom 513 had MICS-CABG and 955 had traditional CABG. The number of patients undergoing repeat revascularization within the eight-year surveillance was 99 for MICS-CABG and 75 for traditional CABG. The Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimates for eight years were 0.86 for MICS-CABG and 0.91 for traditional CABG. The mean time until a repeat revascularization event was 84.1 months for MICS-CABG and 88.5 months for traditional CABG.Conclusions: Traditional CABG was found to have a statistically significantly longer time to repeat revascularization than MICS-CABG. Despite the technical challenges associated with MICS-CABG, the time to repeat revascularization was different by only about four months, which may not hold large clinical significance. This suggests that MICS-CABG may have a role to play due to previous findings showing a reduction in complications while allowing for better postoperative recovery periods.

Duodenocaval fistula (DCF) is a rare entity which is sparsely described in the literature. Few etiologies have been listed including chemoradiation therapy. Early recognition may reduce the high mortality rate. We describe the case of a 63-year-old woman with a history of stage III ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, including bevacizumab, who presented to the hospital because of fresh blood per rectum. One month earlier, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit because of hemorrhagic shock secondary to a necrotic duodenal ulcer and was treated with cauterization. The patient was stable when discharged home, however, she was readmitted to the hospital because of hematemesis and hematochezia and was again in hemorrhagic shock for which the patient was urgently transfused. An abdominal computerized tomography (CT) angiography demonstrated locules of air within the intrahepatic and infrahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC), as well as evidence of communication with the duodenal lumen, and a thrombus within the IVC. The patient was evaluated by the surgical oncology and vascular teams, who deemed the patient inoperable. Our case describes ovarian malignancy, treated by radiation, leading to duodenitis, with subsequent ulcer formation. The co-administration of bevacizumab delayed gastric healing and promoted ulcer perforation favoring fistula formation.