A growing body of empirical evidence is revealing the value of nature experience for mental health. With rapid urbanization and declines in human contact with nature globally, crucial decisions must be made about how to preserve and enhance opportunities for nature experience. Here, we first provide points of consensus across the natural, social, and health sciences on the impacts of nature experience on cognitive functioning, emotional well-being, and other dimensions of mental health. We then show how ecosystem service assessments can be expanded to include mental health, and provide a heuristic, conceptual model for doing so.
Exposure to natural environments, compared to built spaces, has been shown to confer important psychological benefits. Furthermore, people generally exhibit preferences for natural landscapes over man-made buildings. However, some forms of architectural design draw inspiration from natural systems and thus exhibit similar sensory qualities as nature itself. Can these natural features be measured, and are buildings which exhibit these features inherently preferred? Here, we examined whether subjective perceptions of naturalness in architectural scenes are driven by objective visual patterns, and we investigated whether natural patterns influence similarity evaluations and preference ratings of architectural scenes. Experiment 1 revealed that low-level spatial and color features of architectural scenes explained over half of the variance in scene naturalness ratings. Scaling and Contrast-related features were especially strong predictors of naturalness for both interior and exterior scenes. In Experiment 2, participants completed an image arrangement task and multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis was performed on the data to determine the underlying aesthetic dimensions that drove scene similarity judgements. Naturalness ratings explained over half of the variance in MDS Dimension 1 weights, suggesting that people relied on latent perceptions of naturalness to evaluate the similarity of architectural scenes. In the final experiment, participants rated architectural scenes on aesthetic preference. Nature-like patterns of Scaling and Contrast significantly predicted preference ratings. Furthermore, the effects of Scaling and Contrast on preference were mediated by latent perceptions of naturalness, indicating that these architectural patterns are preferred because they evoke intuitive associations with sensory features of nature. Collectively, these studies suggest that people may be innately attuned to naturalistic features of the built environment, and that these features can be measured using computational methods of image analysis.
It is commonly assumed that cities are detrimental to mental health. However, the evidence remains inconsistent and at most, makes the case for differences between rural and urban environments as a whole. Here, we propose a model of depression driven by an individual’s accumulated experience mediated by social networks. The connection between observed systematic variations in socioeconomic networks and built environments with city size provides a link between urbanization and mental health. Surprisingly, this model predicts lower depression rates in larger cities. We confirm this prediction for US cities using four independent datasets. These results are consistent with other behaviors associated with denser socioeconomic networks and suggest that larger cities provide a buffer against depression. This approach introduces a systematic framework for conceptualizing and modeling mental health in complex physical and social networks, producing testable predictions for environmental and social determinants of mental health also applicable to other psychopathologies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.