Why do all mammals, except for sloths and manatees, have exactly seven cervical vertebrae? In other vertebrates and other regions, the vertebral number varies considerably. We investigated whether natural selection constrains the number of cervical vertebrae in humans. To this end, we determined the incidence of cervical ribs and other homeotic vertebral changes in radiographs of deceased human fetuses and infants, and analyzed several existing datasets on the incidence in infants and adults. Our data show that homeotic transformations that change the number of cervical vertebrae are extremely common in humans, but are strongly selected against: almost all individuals die before reproduction. Selection is most probably indirect, caused by a strong coupling of such changes with major congenital abnormalities. Changes in the number of thoracic vertebrae appear to be subject to weaker selection, in good correspondence with the weaker evolutionary constraint on these numbers. Our analysis highlights the role of prenatal selection in the conservation of our common body plan.

No abstract

Hormonal mechanisms underlie many life-history traits and their interactions. We studied the role of ecdysteroids with regard to wing pattern and development time of the polyphenic butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Ecdysteroid titers and sensitivity to ecdysone injection were assayed for two-trait selected lines (ventral eyespot size and development time concurrently). These two traits are genetically and phenotypically coupled, having a common endocrinal basis. Two-trait selection had been applied both antagonistically (opposite the correlation) and synergistically (in the same direction as the correlation). Although selected lines had diverged most in eyespot size, the widest differences in timing of ecdysteroid titers were observed between the development time selection regimes; fast selected lines had an earlier hormonal increase after pupation than slow selected lines (even when corrected for differential pupal times). This endocrine peak was also earlier for females than for males. Furthermore, sensitivity to ecdysone injection as measured by a subsequent decrease in pupal time was significantly lower for slow selected lines than for fast or unselected lines. We conclude that the observed response in eyespot size to artificial selection must have been achieved via alteration of, or selection on, other developmental mechanisms, because the dynamics of the alternative, hormonal, pathway were dictated by development time selection. The developmental system is flexible enough to allow evolution in directions opposing the correlation between wing pattern and developmental time, and responses to selection are not constrained by a shared hormonal system.

The evolution of phenotypic plasticity requires that it is adaptive, genetically determined, and exhibits sufficient genetic variation. For the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana there is evidence that temperature‐mediated plasticity in egg size is an adaptation to predictable seasonal change. Here we set out to investigate heritability in egg size and genetic variation in the plastic response to temperature in this species, using a half‐sib breeding design. Egg size of individual females was first measured at a high temperature 4 days after eclosion. Females were then transferred to a low temperature and egg size was measured after acclimation periods of 6 and 12 days respectively. Overall, additive genetic variance explained only 3–11% of the total phenotypic variance, whereas maternal effects were more pronounced. Genotype–environment interactions and cross‐environmental correlations of less than unity suggest that there is potential for short‐term evolutionary change. Our findings strengthen the support for the adaptive nature of temperature‐mediated plasticity in egg size.

No abstract