No abstract

The Army Research Laboratory (ARL) was asked to participate in an OSD-funded erosion effort by the Coating Technology Integration Office at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Solid particle (sand) erosion testing was conducted by the University of Dayton Research Institute to determine the erosion resistance of materials currently used on the leading edges of Army aviation rotor blades of aircraft in Southwest Asia (SWA). This testing and evaluation was important for two reasons; first, Iraq and Afghanistan are the primary locations of our current anti-terror operations, and second, the sands within these two countries are the worst in the world from an erosion standpoint (dry conditions ? freshest grains of sand ? predominantly angular quartz grains ? blowing winds). The sand utilized herein is considered even more erosive than the sand from these two countries, since they contain a higher concentration of quartz than the SWA sand. In 2005, observations of actual SWA field failures of helicopter rotor blade protective tapes and coatings were compared to existing state-of-the-art, laboratory-based sand erosion data during a U.S. Army sponsored program. Laboratory-produced data did not match the severity of field-use damage, even under extremely high levels of particle loading. The need to test to erosive failure representative of this environment was determined to be paramount in establishing relative performance levels of erosion resistant protective systems being screened for potential field use. The goal of this effort was to provide two synthetic sand formulas capable of testing various polymer-based candidate rotor blade protective systems to failure. The test media was derived from characterization of sand and dust materials unique to SWA. The synthetic sand mixtures developed by this effort will be incorporated in a new test protocol for sand erosion to represent a truly ''worst case'' test, with extended application to other aerospace components susceptible to sand erosion damage applicable to Department of Defense activities in most dry-hot desert regions. Comprehensive post-test analysis performed by ARL included: visual examination, mass loss calculations, erosion rate determination, surface roughness testing, volume loss calculations, scanning electron microscopy characterization, and metallography. As a result of post-test analysis, many trends were observed, with the results documented herein. The results of this testing have been used as a baseline for future testing of alternative materials and coating systems, and to prepare a solid particle erosion test standard (MIL-STD-3033).

This review critically examines the current understanding of calcia-magnesia-aluminasilicate (CMAS) degradation mechanisms and mitigation approaches in thermal and environmental barrier coatings. First, the review introduces case studies of field returned engine components exposed to CMAS attack, followed by fundamental aspects of CMASinduced degradation. Understanding CMAS adhesion, infiltration, spallation mechanics, and thermochemical attack mechanisms is crucial to designing materials approaches to mitigate CMAS attack. CMAS mitigation strategies have focused on reactive approaches aimed at crystallising molten CMAS at the earliest stage possible to inhibit infiltration. Promising approaches are presented, starting with fundamental reaction kinetics studies, followed by the effects of microstructure in actual coatings systems. Salient results on coating systems tested in various burner rigs and a full engine test are presented to benchmark the success of various mitigation strategies. Lastly, several key future research areas are presented in order to provide a roadmap towards 'sandphobic' thermal and environmental barrier systems.

No abstract

No abstract