Parasites are one of the strongest selective agents in nature. They select for hosts that evolve counter‐adaptive strategies to cope with infection. Helminth parasites are special because they can modulate their hosts’ immune responses. This phenomenon is important in epidemiological contexts, where coinfections may be affected. How different types of hosts and helminths interact with each other is insufficiently investigated. We used the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) – Schistocephalus solidus model to study mechanisms and temporal components of helminth immune modulation. Sticklebacks from two contrasting populations with either high resistance (HR) or low resistance (LR) against S. solidus, were individually exposed to S. solidus strains with characteristically high growth (HG) or low growth (LG) in G. aculeatus. We determined the susceptibility to another parasite, the eye fluke Diplostomum pseudospathaceum, and the expression of 23 key immune genes at three time points after S. solidus infection. D. pseudospathaceum infection rates and the gene expression responses depended on host and S. solidus type and changed over time. Whereas the effect of S. solidus type was not significant after three weeks, T regulatory responses and complement components were upregulated at later time points if hosts were infected with HG S. solidus. HR hosts showed a well orchestrated immune response, which was absent in LR hosts. Our results emphasize the role of regulatory T cells and the timing of specific immune responses during helminth infections. This study elucidates the importance to consider different coevolutionary trajectories and ecologies when studying host‐parasite interactions.
Parasite virulence is a key trait in host-parasite interactions and plays a crucial role in infection dynamics. Our study system offers the rare opportunity to study the virulence of an individual macroparasite (Schistocephalus solidus) in its vertebrate fish host (Gasterosteus aculeatus). The size of the tapeworm in the fish can be regarded as a good proxy for individual parasite virulence, as parasite size correlates negatively with fitness traits of the stickleback host (i.e. the bigger the parasite, the lower the host's reproductive success) as well as directly with the number of parasite offspring to be expected. To investigate how virulence is inherited, laboratory bred, parasite-naïve stickleback were infected with a cross of two S. solidus populations of either high or low virulence, as well as one hybrid cross between the two. The relative weight of the parasite as expressed in the parasite index served as a measure of virulence. Furthermore, we measured several condition and immune related traits in the fish host to assess parasite impact on the stickleback. We hypothesized that parasite virulence is to a large extent genetically determined and correlated with several fitness traits in the stickleback host. We found that virulence is inherited additively in S. solidus, with hybrids of high and low virulence parasites displaying intermediate levels. However, contrary to expectation, infection rate of S. solidus in three-spined stickleback is not related to virulence. Even though the presence of the parasite caused differences in host condition, these were indistinguishable between the different levels of virulence in this experiment. Fish immune traits also showed a response to infection but had no correlation with level of parasite virulence. With this experiment we have taken the first step towards understanding how virulence is inherited and how it is driven in the Schistocephalus-stickleback system, even though virulence, as measured here, does not directly translate into cost for the host. A better understanding of the costs inflicted on the host by S. solidus infection is needed to understand this interaction in greater detail.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.