Results from 23 studies examining associations between therapeutic relationship variables and treatment outcomes in child and adolescent therapy were reviewed with meta-analytic procedures. Results indicated that the overall strength of the relationship-outcome associations was modest and quite similar to results obtained with adults. This modest association was moderated by 1 substantive factor, type of patient problem, and 5 methodological factors, timing and source of relationship measurement, type and source of outcome, and shared versus cross-source measurement of relationship and outcome variables. Type, mode, structure, and context of treatment did not moderate associations between relationship variables and outcomes. Findings indicated that the association between the therapeutic relationship and treatment outcome was consistent across developmental levels and across diverse types and contexts of child and adolescent therapy. Recommendations for future process research on the therapeutic relationship in child psychotherapy are offered.

No abstract

The therapeutic alliance has a long history in the child and adolescent psychotherapy literature. This article examines prominent views on the alliance with youth and considers a number of issues that distinguish youth alliance from its adult counterpart. A meta-analysis of alliance-outcome associations in individual youth therapy is presented. In order to provide a direct comparison with the adult literature, the review included only prospective studies of individual youth therapy that used an explicit measure of alliance. Results from 16 studies revealed consistency with the adult literature with a weighted mean correlation of .22 (k = 16, n = 1306, p < .001) between alliance and outcome (CI = +/-.06). Although there were trends showing stronger alliance-outcome associations for child versus adolescent therapy and for behavioral versus nonbehavioral therapies, only problem type (substance abuse and mixed problems vs. eating disorders) significantly moderated alliance-outcome associations. Limitations of the research and implications for therapeutic practice are discussed.

Recently there has been an increasing emphasis in the youth and family mental health treatment literature on the use of empirically supported treatments (ESTs). In contrast there has been scant attention paid to more universal aspects of the therapy process that may have even greater impact upon therapy outcomes. It is likely that the success of the techniques proposed by ESTs may depend on the presence of common process factors. In this article, the authors explore the status of common process factors research in the youth and family therapy literature, and propose a theoretical model linking specific therapeutic relationship variables and treatment outcomes for children and adolescents. This model is intended to guide synthesis of the empirical evidence for common process factors in youth and family treatment and to stimulate future research on common process factors.

In the youth treatment literature, the alliance has been defined and measured as a consensual or collaborative bond. In this article, we review varied definitions of the alliance, enumerate its frequent measures, and present clinical examples. We provide a meta-analytic review on the relation between the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome in child and adolescent psychotherapy. In particular, this review only includes prospective studies of youth therapy that used an explicit measure of alliance. The meta-analysis of 28 studies revealed a weighted random effect size of r ϭ .19 (k ϭ 28, N ϭ 2419, p Ͻ .01, 95% confidence interval [.13, .25]), which is a small to medium effect (equivalent to d ϭ 0.39) consistent with the adult alliance literature and with prior youth meta-analyses. Given that a mediumlarge amount of heterogeneity was observed in effect sizes (I 2 ϭ 64.19%), theory-and method-based moderators were examined. Multiple moderators of the alliance-outcome association were found, including diagnosis class, type of therapy, study design (randomized controlled trials [RCT] vs. nonrandomized trials [non-RCT]), and treatment setting (inpatient vs. outpatient). Research limitations, patient contributions, and diversity considerations follow. The article concludes with research-informed practices for building and maintaining the therapeutic alliance with youth. Clinical Impact StatementAlthough many youth treatments have been found effective, less is known about treatment processes that may explain variability in treatment outcomes. Question: This study examined the strength of the correlation between the alliance and youth treatment outcome. Findings: This meta-analysis showed that the therapeutic alliance has a small to medium association to outcome that varies depending upon diagnosis, type of therapy, study design, and treatment setting. Meaning: Alliance formation and maintenance over the course of treatment has the potential to aid clinicians in achieving positive outcomes in youth psychotherapy across disorders. Next Steps: To investigate the effects on the alliance and treatment outcome of clinicians attending to youth and parent characteristics and their own behaviors when attempting to engage them in treatment.