The variable configuration of Raman spectroscopic platforms is one of the major obstacles in establishing Raman spectroscopy as a valuable physicochemical method within real-world scenarios such as clinical diagnostics. For such real world applications like diagnostic classification, the models should ideally be usable to predict data from different setups. Whether it is done by training a rugged model with data from many setups or by a primary-replica strategy where models are developed on a 'primary' setup and the test data are generated on 'replicate' setups, this is only possible if the Raman spectra from different setups are consistent, reproducible, and comparable. However, Raman spectra can be highly sensitive to the measurement conditions, and they change from setup to setup even if the same samples are measured. Although increasingly recognized as an issue, the dependence of the Raman spectra on the instrumental configuration is far from being fully understood and great effort is needed to address the resulting spectral variations and to correct for them. To make the severity of the situation clear, we present a round robin experiment investigating the comparability of 35 Raman spectroscopic devices with different configurations in 15 institutes within seven European countries from the COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) action Raman4clinics. The experiment was developed in a fashion that allows various instrumental configurations ranging from highly confocal setups to fibre-optic based systems with different excitation wavelengths. We illustrate the spectral variations caused by the instrumental configurations from the perspectives of peak shifts, intensity variations, peak widths, and noise levels. We conclude this contribution with recommendations that may help to improve the inter-laboratory studies.

Neutrophils are important cells of the innate immune system and the major leukocyte subpopulation in blood. They are responsible for recognizing and neutralizing invading pathogens, such as bacteria or fungi. For this, neutrophils are well equipped with pathogen recognizing receptors, cytokines, effector molecules, and granules filled with reactive oxygen species (ROS)-producing enzymes. Depending on the pathogen type, different reactions are triggered, which result in specific activation states of the neutrophils. Here, we aim to establish a label-free method to indirectly detect infections and to identify the cause of infection by spectroscopic characterization of the neutrophils. For this, isolated neutrophils from human peripheral blood were stimulated in an in vitro infection model with heat-inactivated Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) bacterial pathogens as well as with heat-inactivated and viable fungi (Candida albicans). Label-free and nondestructive Raman spectroscopy was used to characterize neutrophils on a single cell level. Phagocytized fungi could be visualized in a few high-resolution false color images of individual neutrophils using label-free Raman spectroscopic imaging. Using a high-throughput screening Raman spectroscope (HTS-RS), Raman spectra of more than 2000 individual neutrophils from three different donors were collected in each treatment group, yielding a data set of almost 20 000 neutrophil spectra. Random forest classification models were trained to differentiate infected and noninfected cells with high accuracy (90%). Among the neutrophils challenged with pathogens, even the cause of infection, bacterial or fungal, was predicted correctly with 92% accuracy. Therefore, Raman spectroscopy enables reliable neutrophil phenotyping and infection diagnosis in a label-free manner. In contrast to the microbiological diagnostic standard, where the pathogen is isolated in time-consuming cultivation, this Raman-based method could potentially be blood-culture independent, thus saving precious time in bloodstream infection diagnostics.