The color of wine is an important quality parameter essential for the first impression of consumers. The International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV) recommends two methods to describe wine color: color calculation according to Glories and the determination of coordinates in the CIE L*a*b* color space. The measurement of wine color is often not feasible for winemakers because the required instrumentation is expensive and bulky. In this study, the influence of photometer settings on the calculated color was investigated based on 14 wines. Furthermore, the CIE L*a*b* and Glories system were compared using 56 red and 56 white wines. Photometer settings were found to influence the reproducibility of color determination. In addition, CIE L*a*b* system do not correlate in all wines with the Glories system and Glories probably provides less information about wine color. Using interpolation, CIE L*a*b* coordinates were calculated from single wavelength measurements taken by a small-sized and inexpensive portable analysis system, which could be used by winemakers in the future.

The Glories method and CIE L*a*b* color space are poorly correlated in the light red high-saturation color area. Non-uniformities in the CIE L*a*b* color space have led to the CIEDE2000 formula, while the Euclidean color distance is still used in wine research. In this study, 112 white and red wines were examined to compare the Glories method, CIE L*a*b, and human perception using monovarietal wines from different grape varieties. The objective of this study was to investigate which of the two methods and which parameter of each method better aligned with human perception. The visual color threshold was re-evaluated with the CIEDE2000 formula and triangle testing. CIE L*a*b* more closely matched the human perception, elevating the use of CIE L*a*b* over the use of the Glories method. Visual color thresholds were better expressed with CIEDE2000 but still varied depending upon the color area in the CIE L*a*b* color space.