Convergence of various afferent inputs onto brainstem neurones may play an important role in the regulation of trigeminal motor activity. In particular, previous studies suggest that, besides sensory inputs arising from the orofacial region, extratrigeminal information may modulate jaw muscle function. In the present study the actions exerted on masseter and digastric muscles by the activation of somatosensory afferents coming from fore- and hind limbs were examined. The electromyographic activity (EMG) of masseter and digastric muscles was recorded in 20 anaesthetised rats, and EMG responses to single and paired electrical stimulation of common radial and sciatic nerves, at a threshold intensity for the activation of group II afferent fibres, were studied. The stimulation induced an excitatory response in both masseter and digastric muscles bilaterally. Ipsiand contralateral radial nerve stimulation evoked masseter responses at latencies of 13.8 +/- 2.4 ms and of 18.0 +/- 2.6 ms, respectively, and digastric responses 1.6 +/- 0.4 ms later. Ipsi- and contralateral sciatic nerve stimulation elicited masseter responses at latencies of 21.4 +/- 2.6 ms and of 23.3 +/- 2.0 ms, respectively, and digastric responses 2.0 +/- 0.2 ms later. The same masseter and digastric motor units were excited by both radial and sciatic nerve stimulation; this suggests a convergence of somatosensory inputs arising from fore- and hind limbs on the same pool of masseter and digastric motoneurones. Paired stimulation of the two nerves did not induce any summation of the responses; this finding suggests that the two inputs, reaching a common relay station, could give rise either to occlusion or to inhibitory interactions. Spinotrigeminal relationship evidenced in this study may be involved in the coordination of jaw and limb movements.

No abstract

Recent electrophysiological data obtained in anaesthetized rats evidenced jaw muscle excitatory responses to the electrical stimulation of type II limb somatosensory afferents. In the present work, we describe an inhibitory reflex evoked in human masseter muscles by stimulation of non-nociceptive fibres travelling in the median and radial nerves (MED and RAD, respectively). Eighteen healthy volunteers participated in the study. Subjects were seated on a comfortable chair, with the complex head-mandible-neck-trunk and the limbs securely fixed to the chair. Attempts were made to minimize possible interferences due to the activation of afferents other than the stimulated ones. The subjects were instructed to contract masseter muscles at a submaximal level and to maintain a stable level of muscle contraction during all trials. EMG voluntary activity was recorded from both masseter muscles by means of coaxial needle electrodes before and after the electrical stimulation of MED and/or RAD at intensities below pain threshold. In all subjects, MED stimulation induced bilaterally a marked depression of masseter EMG activity, which occurred at a latency of 23.6 +/- 2.1 ms and lasted 27.8 +/- 6.6 ms. RAD stimulation also induced a marked reduction in masseter EMG activity, but this effect was clearly observed in 9 out of 18 subjects, and it showed latency (30.2 +/- 7.5 ms) and duration (44.9 +/- 5.4 ms) significantly longer in comparison with the MED-induced effect. All subjects exhibited the inhibitory period in masseter EMG following the simultaneous stimulation of both nerves; this one appeared at a latency not significantly different (25.3 +/- 5.9 ms) and lasted much more (37.4 +/ - 8.2 ms) than EMG depression evoked by MED stimulation. The duration of masseter muscle inhibition, induced by MED and/or RAD stimulation, was inversely related to the level of EMG activity, while latency was not related to it. Significant increases in the inhibitory period duration were also observed by increasing stimulus intensity, within a subthreshold range for the activation of nociceptive fibres. In all cases, the inhibitory period was followed by a later excitatory rebound activity, whose latency and duration depended on the duration of the preceding EMG inhibition and on the background level of masseter activation. In conclusion, results evidenced that the activation of arm somatosensory fibres modulates masseter muscle activity in normal man. This might lead to a coordination between limb and masticatory muscle activity, which is required in several complex motor acts.

The effects induced by non-noxious electrical stimulation of upper limb nerves on exteroceptive suppression (ES) of masseter muscle EMG activity were studied in 15 healthy subjects. EMG activity of masseter muscles was recorded bilaterally and great care was taken to minimise the activation of afferents other than the stimulated ones. Masseter ES was elicited by applying a non-noxious electrical stimulus to the skin above the mental nerve (Mt) of one side, during a voluntary contraction of masseter muscles at a prescribed steady clenching level. Onset and offset latencies and duration of early and late components of masseter ES (ES1 and ES2, respectively) were evaluated in control conditions and compared to those obtained when a non-noxious electrical stimulation was delivered separately to Med or Rad or simultaneously to both nerves (Med-Rad) of one side. Upper limb nerve stimulation could be simultaneous or it could precede or follow Mt stimulation by various time intervals. In control conditions, ES1 latency onset and duration values (mean +/- SD) were 11.3+/-2.9 ms and 16.9+/-2.1 ms, respectively, and ES2 latency onset and duration values were 44.5+/-6.0 ms and 28.6+/-11.1 ms, respectively. No significant differences were observed which were related to the side being recorded. Two types of effects, opposite in nature, were shown on masseter ES, depending on the time intervals between Mt and upper limb nerve stimulation. The first effect, which was facilitatory, consisted of a significant increase in ES1 and ES2 duration. A maximal increase in ES1 duration (134-155% compared to control value) occurred when upper limb nerve stimulation preceded that of Mt by 18-30 ms. Maximal ES2 lengthening (115-145%) was observed when upper limb nerve stimulation followed that of the Mt by 10 ms. The second effect was inhibitory and affected only ES2, which appeared completely eliminated when Med stimulation preceded that of Mt by 40-80 ms. By contrast, ES1 was never suppressed at any interstimulus interval. These data might reflect the different action of the central outflow, following the upper limb-induced effects, on the different neuronal circuits mediating ES1 and ES2.

No abstract