Background: Gestational diabetes (GDM) is glucose intolerance detected for the first time during pregnancy. Women with a history of GDM have a 7-fold higher lifetime risk of developing type 2 diabetes (DMII) compared to women without a history of GDM. Women with a history of GDM should be screened for DMII 6 to 12 weeks postpartum with a 2-hour 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and then again one year after delivery. The long-term goal of this project is to improve screening for DMII in women with a history of GDM. This report establishes the prevalence of GDM, determines the postpartum screening rate, and assesses for barriers to screening at an urban safety-net hospital. This information will be used to design interventions to improve postpartum screening. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of women who had a delivery at Truman Medical Center between January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019 and had a diagnosis of GDM. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, management of GDM, postpartum appointments, and screening for DMII. Results: There were 9569 deliveries during the three-year period. Of the total deliveries, 537 (5.6%) had a diagnosis of GDM. Of the patients with GDM, 426 (79%) had a postpartum visit scheduled, 354 (66%) attended a 6-week postpartum appointment, 219 (41%) had the recommended test ordered, and 49 (9%) completed the test. The data revealed a significant association with ethnicity, language, insurance type, and site of prenatal care with attending the postpartum appointment (p<0.05) as well as with insurance status on completing the screening test (p<0.05). Conclusion: There is gap in the number of women with GDM and those who are screened for DMII in the postpartum period. There appears to be a disconnect in the ordering of the recommended 2-hour OGTT and the completion of the test. The baseline data supports a multi-prong approach including patient education, system changes, and advocacy for extended insurance benefits to cover screening. Disclosure V. Rakhra: None. M. Riley: None. S. Jordan: None. S. Bulchandani: None. J. Allsworth: None. B. Drees: None.

Interprofessional education has been gaining traction in the educational and professional climate today. As a shift has been made to incorporate the collaboration of health professionals into education, benefits in overall quality of education and patient care have been observed. Students who are involved in IPE are able to learn about other careers, learn the limitations of their own career, cement existing knowledge, develop relationships with members of various fields, improve teamwork skills, and enhance their job satisfaction. Patients have also benefited from the new IPE implementation. As a result of increased collaboration, there has been a reduction in patient errors and overall improved quality of care among programs who participate in IPE.