Study design: Retrospective cohort of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) that have been hospitalized for physical-functional rehabilitation purposes. Objectives: To compare the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) after urodynamic study (UDS) in three hospitals that adopted different protocols with regard to the preparation of patients. Setting: Sarah Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brazil. Materials and Methods: Between 2014 and 2015, 661 patients from three units of the same hospital network, one of which does not use antimicrobial prophylaxis independently of urine culture results, were evaluated after having undergone UDS. The results were compared in both univariate and multivariate analyses (logistic regression). Results: The global rate of UTI after UDS was that of 3.18% (IC 95% 2.1-4.8), with no differences between the units. In the univariate analysis the only variable that was associated with UTI after UDS was that of T6 injuries or above (P = 0.029). The logistic regression has confirmed this result, with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.06 (IC 95% 1.01 to 9.26; P = 0.0476). The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis did not alter that risk. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that the use of antimicrobials does not prevent UTI after UDS. Patients with T6 traumatic SCI or above have got three times more chance of developing UTI after UDS if compared to those with a T7 injury or below, independently of the use of antimicrobials. Even in these patients the use of antimicrobials would not be justified.
We thank you for your comments on our latest publication (1). Indeed, what has motivated us the most to carry out this investigation was the lack of evidence concerning the usage of antimicrobials prior to urodynamic studies in spinal cord injured patients (2). An unexpected result for us was the greater incidence of urinary tract infection upon patients with injuries at T6 or above, regardlessly of the use of antimicrobials prior to the procedure.At this exact moment we are working on a new publication that details the incidence of urinary tract infection specifi cally amongst the 379 spinal cord injured patients with injuries at T6 or above, now considering the presence of autonomic dysrefl exia and urodynamic parameters. The results are becoming clinically relevant. Yours Sincerely, Authors CONFLICT OF INTERESTNone declared. REFERENCES 1. Floyd MS Jr, Khadr RN. Re: Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to urodynamic study in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Is there an indication? Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45:860-1. 2. da Silva MT, Barboza AL, Pijoán MM, Beraldo PSS. Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to urodynamic study in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Is there na indication? Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45:347-53.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.