HTCT 3120 1-8 hematol transfus cell ther. 2 0 2 0;x x x(x x):xxx-xxx w w w . h t c t . c o m . b r Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy

No abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate a prognostic score for aids-related lymphoma (ARL). A retrospective study of 104 patients with ARL treated between January 1999 and December 2007 was conducted. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBC) was the most observed histological type (79.8%). The median CD4 lymphocyte count at lymphoma diagnosis was 125 cells per microliter. Treatment response could be evaluated in 83 (79.8%) patients, and 38 (45.8%) reached complete remission (CR); overall response rate was 51.8% (95 CI = 38.5-65.1%). After a median follow-up of 48 months, the 4-year overall survival (OS) rate among all patients was 35.8%, with a median survival time of 9.7 months (95% CI = 5.5-13.9 months). The survival risk factors observed in multivariate analysis (previous AIDS and high-intermediate/high international prognostic index (IPI)) were combined to construct a risk score, which divided the whole patient population in three distinct groups as low, intermediate, and high risk. When this score was applied to DLBC patients, a clear distinction in response rates and in OS could be demonstrated. Median disease-free survival (DFS) for patients that achieved CR was not reached, and DFS in 4 years was 83.0%. Our results show that the reduced OS observed could be explained by poor immune status with advanced stage of disease seen in our population of HIV-positive patients. Further studies will be needed to clarify the role of different treatment approaches for ARL in the setting of marked immunosuppression and to identify a group of patients to whom intensive therapy could be performed with a curative intent.

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) typically occurs in elderly patients and has a highly variable clinical course. It is important to understand the aspects that affect the outcomes of CLL in a real-world setting. Besides biological factors, other socioeconomic and health system factors may influence the clinical course of CLL. Hence, data from the Brazilian Registry of CLL was analyzed to compare clinical and treatment-related characteristics in patients with CLL treated in public or in private institutions in Brazil. Objective: To describe the outcomes of a series of CLL patients followed in public or in private hospitals in Brazil. Methods: The Brazilian Registry of CLL was started in 2004 as a prospective non-interventional data collection tool. Inclusion criteria for enrollment followed the IWCLL guidelines. For this analysis, we included all patients with minimum available data for analysis of patient and disease characteristics and survival. Results/discussion: From January 2004 to July 2020, 2927 patients from 37 centers met eligibility criteria for this analysis: 2324 (79%) were followed at public hospitals and 603 (21%) at private hospitals. The majority were male (57%), with median age of 65 years (ranging from 23 to 106). Binet stage was A in 1618 (58%) patients, B in 628 (23%) and C in 525 (19%). FISH for del(17p) was performed in only 479 patients (16%), while FISH for the most common aberrations [del(13q), +12, del(11q), and del(17p)] was performed in only 445 patients (15%). IGVH mutational status was performed in only 211 patients (7%), and karyotype in only 140 patients (5%). Comparing public and private hospitals, we observed that patients in public hospital are slightly older (median age 66 years vs. 64 years for private hospitals, P=0.04), had more advanced diseases at diagnosis (frequency of Binet B or C was 44% in public vs. 32% in private hospital, P<0.0001), and there were more patients with elevated creatinine levels (14% vs. 10%, P=0.03). All prognostic markers were significantly more available in private than in public hospitals: FISH for del17p (42% of cases vs. 10%, respectively, P<0.0001), IGVH mutational status (13% vs. 6%, respectively, P<0.0001) and karyotype (16% vs. 2%, respectively, P<0.0001). The frequency of del(17p) was similar between public and private hospitals (10% vs. 11%, P=NS), while the frequency of unmutated IGHV status was more common in private hospitals, although not statistically different (60% vs. 48%, P=0.09). Analyzing 2102 diagnosed after 2010, we observed that 864 patients (41%) were treated after a median time of 7 months (range: 0-267) after diagnosis. First line treatment was predominantly based chlorambucil (45%) or fludarabine (40%). Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody was used in only 39% of cases: (rituximab in 35% and obinutuzumab in 4%). Novel agents were used in first line in only 2% of patients, and in most cases in the context of a clinical trial. Of note, most patients (86%) with del(17p) detected by FISH were treated with chemoimmunotherapy. When comparing treatments between public or private hospitals we observed striking differences: in public hospitals there were significantly less patients receiving fludarabine-base regimens (36% vs. 54%, P<0.0001), and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (28% vs. 78%, P<0.0001). Overall survival at 6 years was significantly worse in public than in private hospitals (72% vs. 93%, respectively, P<0.0001). After a multivariate analysis, survival in patients from public hospitals remained significantly worse than in private hospitals (hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 2.4 - 4.8), after correcting for age, Binet staging and renal function. Conclusion: Our data indicate that are striking differences between patients treated in public or private hospitals in Brazil. The lack of accessibility to basic laboratory tests for prognostic factors and adequate therapies probably explains the worse outcome of patients treated in public institutions. In fact, prognostic testing rates were poor in both contexts and most high-risk patients received chemoimmunotherapy first-line. Urgent strategies are needed to increase accessibility to prognostic testing and to novel agents for quality improvement in health care in CLL patients in Brazil. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

No abstract