The objective of this paper is to evaluate available evidence for each step in autoimmune encephalitis management and provide expert opinion when evidence is lacking. The paper approaches autoimmune encephalitis as a broad category rather than focusing on individual antibody syndromes. Core authors from the Autoimmune Encephalitis Alliance Clinicians Network reviewed literature and developed the first draft. Where evidence was lacking or controversial, an electronic survey was distributed to all members to solicit individual responses. Sixty-eight members from 17 countries answered the survey. Corticosteroids alone or combined with other agents (intravenous IG or plasmapheresis) were selected as a first-line therapy by 84% of responders for patients with a general presentation, 74% for patients presenting with faciobrachial dystonic seizures, 63% for NMDAR-IgG encephalitis and 48.5% for classical paraneoplastic encephalitis. Half the responders indicated they would add a second-line agent only if there was no response to more than one first-line agent, 32% indicated adding a second-line agent if there was no response to one first-line agent, while only 15% indicated using a second-line agent in all patients. As for the preferred second-line agent, 80% of responders chose rituximab while only 10% chose cyclophosphamide in a clinical scenario with unknown antibodies. Detailed survey results are presented in the manuscript and a summary of the diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations is presented at the conclusion.

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO)-immunoglobulin G seropositivity predicts poor visual outcome and development of NMO. Seropositive recurrent optic neuritis is a limited form of NMO.

Objective Neuromyelitis optica and its spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IDD) with a specific biomarker, aquaporin-4-IgG. Prior NMO/NMOSD epidemiological studies are limited by lack of aquaporin-4-IgG seroprevalence assessment, absence of population-based USA studies and under-representation of blacks. To overcome these limitations, we sought to compare NMO/NMOSD seroepidemiology across two ethnically divergent populations. Methods We performed a population-based comparative study of the incidence (2003–2011) and prevalence (on December 31, 2011) of NMO/NMOSD and aquaporin-4-IgG seroincidence and seroprevalence (sera collected in 80–84% of IDD) among patients with IDD diagnosis in Olmsted County, USA (82% white [Caucasian]) and Martinique (90% black [Afro-Caribbean]). Aquaporin-4-IgG was measured by M1-isoform-fluorescent-activated-cell-sorting assays. Results The age and sex adjusted incidence (7.3 vs 0.7/1,000,000 person-years [p<0.01]) and prevalence (10 vs 3.9/100,000[p=0.01]) in Martinique exceeded that in Olmsted County. The AQP4-IgG age and sex-adjusted seroincidence (6.5 vs 0.7/1,000,000 person-years [p<0.01]) and seroprevalence (7.9 vs 3.3/100,000[p=0.04]) were also higher in Martinique than Olmsted County. The ethnicity-specific prevalence was similar in Martinique and Olmsted County: 11.5 and 13/100,000 in blacks, and 6.1 and 4.0/100,000 in whites, respectively. NMO/NMOSD represented a higher proportion of IDD in Martinique than Olmsted County (16% vs 1.4%; p<0.01). The onset age (median, 35–37 years) and female:male distribution (8–9:1) were similar across both populations; 60% of prevalent cases were either blind in one eye, dependent on a gait aid or both. Interpretation This study reports the highest prevalence of NMO/NMOSD in any population (10/100,000 in Martinique), estimates it affects 16,000–17,000 in the USA (higher than previous predictions) and demonstrates it disproportionately affects blacks.