The surface and subsurface conditions of components are critical for their functional properties. Every manufacturing process modifies the surface condition as a consequence of its mechanical, chemical, and thermal impact or combinations of the three. The depth of the affected zone varies for different machining operations and is related to the process parameters and characteristics. Furthermore, the initial material state has a decisive influence on the modifications that lead to the final surface conditions. With this knowledge, the collaborative research center CRC/Transregio 136 “Process Signatures” started a first joint investigation to analyze the influence of several machining operations on the surface modifications of uniformly premanufactured samples in a broad study. The present paper focusses on four defined process chains which were analyzed in detail regarding the resulting surface conditions as a function of the initial state. Two different workpiece geometries of the same initial material (AISI 4140, 42CrMo4 (1.7225) classified according to DIN EN ISO 683-2) were treated in two different heat treating lines. Samples annealed to a ferritic-perlitic microstructure were additionally deep rolled as starting condition. Quenched and tempered samples were induction hardened before further process application. These two states were then submitted to six different manufacturing processes, i.e., grinding (with mainly mechanical or thermal impact), precision turning (mainly mechanical), laser processing (mainly thermal), electrical discharge machining (EDM, mainly thermal) and electrochemical machining (ECM, (mainly chemical impact). The resulting surface conditions were investigated after each step of the manufacturing chain by specialized analysis techniques regarding residual stresses, microstructure, and hardness distribution. Based on the process knowledge and on the systematic characterizations, the characteristics and depths of the material modifications, as well as their underlying mechanisms and causes, were investigated. Mechanisms occurring within AISI 4140 steel (42CrMo4) due to thermal, mechanical or mixed impacts were identified as work hardening, stress relief, recrystallization, re-hardening and melting, grain growth, and rearrangement of dislocations.
During surface grinding, internal material loads are generated, which take effect on the surface and subsurface zone of AISI 4140 steel. High thermal loads can result in specific material modifications, e.g., hardness reduction and tensile residual stresses, due to inappropriate combinations of system and process parameters which influence the functional performance of the ground component in a negative way. In order to avoid this damaging impact due to the thermal effect, an in-depth understanding of the thermal loads and the resulting modifications is required. This relationship is described in the concept of Process Signatures applied in this paper. Experimentally determined temperature-time histories at various depths below the surface were used to estimate the thermal loads at the surface and subsurface using a numerical approach based on the finite element method (FEM). The results show that the hardness change during surface grinding correlates with the maximum temperature rate at given maximum temperatures. In addition, correlations between the hardness change and the Hollomon–Jaffe parameter are identified, taking into account both the absolute temperature and its evolution over time. Furthermore, it was shown that the surface residual stresses correlate with the maximum local temperature gradients at the surface if no detectable tempering of the microstructure takes place.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.