The role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) to differentiate breast lesions in vivo was evaluated. Sixty women (mean age, 53 years) with 81 breast lesions were enrolled. A coronal echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence sensitised to diffusion (b value=1,000 s/mm(2)) was added to standard MR. The mean diffusivity (MD) was calculated. Differences in MD among cysts, benign lesions and malignant lesions were evaluated, and the sensitivity and specificity of DWI to diagnose malignant and benign lesions were calculated. The diagnosis was 18 cysts, 21 benign and 42 malignant nodules. MD values (mean +/- SD x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) were (1.48 +/- 0.37) for benign lesions, (0.95 +/- 0.18) for malignant lesions and (2.25 +/- 0.26) for cysts. Different MD values characterized different malignant breast lesion types. A MD threshold value of 1.1 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s discriminated malignant breast lesions from benign lesions with a specificity of 81% and sensitivity of 80%. Choosing a cut-off of 1.31 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (MD of malignant lesions -2 SD), the specificity would be 67% with a sensitivity of 100%. Thus, MD values, related to tumor cellularity, provide reliable information to differentiate malignant breast lesions from benign ones. Quantitative DWI is not time-consuming and can be easily inserted into standard clinical breast MR imaging protocols.
The parallel-plate ionization chamber is the recommended tool for the absorbed dose measurement in pulsed high-energy electron beams. Typically, the electron beams used in radiotherapy have a dose-per-pulse value less then 0.1 cGy/pulse. In this range the factor to correct the response of an ionization chamber for the lack of complete charge collection due to ion recombination (ksat) can be properly evaluated with the standard "two voltage" method proposed by the international dosimetric reports. Very high dose-per-pulse electron beams are employed in some special Linac dedicated to the Intra-Operatory-Radiation-Therapy (IORT). The high dose-per-pulse values (3-13 cGy/pulse) characterizing the IORT electron beams allow to deliver the therapeutic dose (10-20 Gy) in less than a minute. This considerably reduces the IORT procedure time, but some dosimetric problems arise because the standard method to evaluate ksat overestimates its value by 20%. Moreover, if the dose-per-pulse value >1 cGy/pulse, the dependence of ksat on the dose-per-pulse value cannot be neglected for relative dosimetry. In this work the dependence of ksat on the dose-per-pulse value is derived, based on the general equation that describes the ion recombination in the Boag theory. A new equation for ksat, depending on known or measurable quantities, is presented. The new ksat equation is experimentally tested by comparing the absorbed doses to water measured with parallel-plate ionization chambers (Roos and Markus) to that measured using dose-per-pulse independent dosimeters, such as radiochromic films and chemical Fricke dosimeters. These measurements are performed in the high dose-per-pulse (3-13 cGy/pulse) electron beams of the IORT dedicated Linac Hitesys Novac7 (Aprilia-Latina, Italy). The dose measurements made using the parallel-plate chambers and those made using the dose-per-pulse independent dosimeters are in good agreement (<3%). This demonstrates the possibility of using the parallel-plate ionization chambers also for the very high dose-per-pulse (> 1 cGy/pulse) electron-beam dosimetry.
A specific and widely accepted protocol for quality controls in DWI is still lacking. The DWI quality assurance protocol proposed in this study can be applied in order to assess the reliability of DWI-derived indices before tackling single- as well as multicenter studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.