Background:Symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee are commonly surgically treated by microfracture (MFX) or matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation (M-ACI). Several randomized controlled trials have compared MFX and M-ACI, showing a tendency to lower reoperation rates for M-ACI, but results vary widely between studies.Purpose:To compare reoperation rates after MFX and M-ACI in cartilage defects of the knee outside clinical trials in a representative sample of the population.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study was based on anonymized, population-representative claims data of 4 million insured persons in Germany. Patients who underwent MFX or M-ACI for cartilage defects of the knee with a follow-up of 2 years were compared. The primary endpoint was the need for a reoperation, defined as a claim for a second surgical procedure from the same patient at the knee joint (27 procedure codes), meniscus and cartilage (35 procedure codes), or patella (102 procedure codes) or the need for knee replacement (11 procedure codes). Group comparisons were performed using log-rank tests, with a 2-sided P value of <.05 to indicate significance. For adjusted analysis, propensity score matching was applied. Age, sex, comedications, and comorbidities were used as matching parameters.Results:A total of 6425 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 6273 treated with MFX and 152 treated with M-ACI (mean age, 53 and 36 years, respectively). In the 2 years after treatment, 1271 patients in the MFX group needed a reoperation compared with 19 in the M-ACI group (20.3% vs 12.5%, respectively; P = .0199). For adjusted analysis after propensity score matching, 127 patients per group were analyzed. Their mean age was 37 years. At the end of the second follow-up year, 28 and 16 patients needed reoperations in the MFX and M-ACI groups, respectively (22.0% vs 12.6%, respectively; P = .0498).Conclusion:This study used a representative sample of the population and a broad definition of a reoperation, thus expanding evidence from clinical trials. We found a significant advantage of M-ACI in reoperation rates 2 years after treatment. After adjusting for age, sex, comedications, and comorbidities, M-ACI still showed significantly lower reoperation rates after 2 years.

Introduction Cartilage defects in the knee can be caused by injury, various types of arthritis, or degeneration. As a long-term consequence of cartilage defects, osteoarthritis can develop over time, often leading to the need for a total knee replacement (TKR). The treatment alternatives of chondral defects include, among others, microfracture, and matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (M-ACI). The purpose of this study was to determine cost-effectiveness of M-ACI in Germany with available mid- and long-term outcome data, with special focus on the avoidance of TKR. Materials and methods We developed a discrete-event simulation (DES) that follows up individuals with cartilage defects of the knee over their lifetimes. The DES was conducted with a status-quo scenario in which M-ACI is available and a comparison scenario with no M-ACI available. The model included 10,000 patients with articular cartilage defects. We assumed Weibull distributions for short- and long-term effects for implant failures. Model outcomes were costs, number of TKRs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). All analyses were performed from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. Results The majority of patients was under 45 years old, with defect sizes between 2 and 7 cm2 (mean: 4.5 cm2); average modeled lifetime was 48 years. In the scenario without M-ACI, 26.4% of patients required a TKR over their lifetime. In the M-ACI scenario, this was the case in only 5.5% of cases. Thus, in the modeled cohort of 10,000 patients, 2700 TKRs, including revisions, could be avoided. Patients treated with M-ACI experienced improved quality of life (22.53 vs. 21.21 QALYs) at higher treatment-related costs (18,589 vs. 14,134 € /patient) compared to those treated without M-ACI, yielding an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 3376 € /QALY. Conclusion M-ACI is projected to be a highly cost‐effective treatment for chondral defects of the knee in the German healthcare setting.

Background:Articular cartilage damage is caused by traumatic sport accidents or age-related degeneration and might lead to osteoarthritis, which represents a socioeconomic burden to society. Cartilage damage in the knee is commonly treated surgically with microfracture (MFX) or matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI).Purpose:To quantify the initial and follow-up costs associated with MFX and MACI treatments from the viewpoint of statutory health insurance in Germany.Study Design:Economic decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2.Methods:This comparative study was based on an anonymized representative claims data set of 4 million patients covered by statutory health insurance in Germany. Patients undergoing outpatient or inpatient treatment with MACI or MFX for cartilage damage in the knee between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013, were included and evaluated over 5 years. Groups (MACI and MFX) were adjusted via propensity score matching before initial treatment. The matched groups were compared regarding their outpatient, inpatient, pharmaceutical, and other costs during the 5-year period.Results:In total, 127 patients per group were analyzed (59.1% male, 40.9% female; mean age, 37 years). In the year of the initial surgical procedure, costs were €14,804.13 in the MACI group and €5458.59 in the MFX group. In years 2 and 3 after initial surgery, treatment costs were comparable between patients treated with MACI (€2897.97 and €2114.87, respectively) and MFX (€2842.66 and €1967.42, respectively), with slightly higher treatment costs for those treated with MACI. In years 4 and 5 after surgery, costs were less in patients treated with MACI (€2154.79 and €1478.08, respectively) than in those treated with MFX (€2232.57 and €2061.63, respectively). Costs related to revision surgery were, on average, €3732 for MACI and €3765 for MFX. Thus, additional costs in years with revision surgery were €1672 for MACI and €1915 for MFX.Conclusion:This was the first study to analyze a large representative population claims database with propensity score matching, and results indicated that follow-up costs of patients treated with MACI and MFX began to converge over time. We found that total costs for MACI were higher than for MFX but that additional costs for MACI were lower than previously reported. Perceived morbidity may have little to do with cost.

MAIC based on MEASURE 2, ATLAS & ADEPT RCTs. The CPR was estimated by dividing drug acquisition cost for the course of treatment with its response rate. Drug costs were based on December 2017 price bulletin and the number of doses required for 52 weeks. (infliximab administration cost also estimated). Results: MAIC showed that ASAS response rates were significantly higher for SEC compared to ADA at 52 weeks. ASAS20 response rates were 81% vs 65%, ASAS40 response rates were 62% vs. 47% and ASAS5/6 response rates were 72% vs. 55% for SEC and ADA, respectively. The CPR for ASAS20 responders were V7,073 vs. V10,139, for ASAS40 responders were V9,195 vs. V14,096 & for ASAS5/6 responders were V7,918 vs. V12,061 for SEC and ADA, respectively. The CPR for ASAS20/40/5/6 responders were 34%/38%/38% lower, respectively, for SEC compared to ADA. ACR20 response rates were 91% vs. 69% & ASAS5/6 response rates were 33% vs. 23% for SEC and INF, respectively. CPR for ACR20 responders were V6,298 vs. V16,046 & for ASAS5/6 responders were V17,281 vs V47,746 for SEC and INF, respectively. Sensitivity analyses confirmed results robustness. Conclusions: The CPR for all ASAS outcomes at 52 weeks were consistently lower for SEC vs. ADA and INF, leading to important savings for Greek Social Security Fund . These findings indicate that may be more efficient treat AS biologic naive patients in Greece with SEC vs. ADA or INF. A potential weakness is that the comparison between drugs is indirect and based on a statistical model.