Femoral shaft nonunions are disabling complications of fractures, with relevant socioeconomic and psychological impact. The incidence of femoral shaft nonunions is not negligible, ranging between 1% and 10% after intramedullary nailing, but can exceed 20% in case of subtrochanteric fractures. Treatment options are influenced by pathomechanical, anatomical, and clinical factors. Hypertrophic nonunions are usually treated by enhancing stability of fixation, while atrophic nonunions require additional biological stimulation to achieve bone union. The Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) System® was developed to reduce intramedullary pressure and heat generation during intramedullary reaming, thus preventing thermal necrosis and decreasing the risk of fat embolism. The RIA System allows to provide large volumes of high-quality morselized autologous bone, that has shown high osteogenetic and osteoinductive properties. Therefore, its use has been expanded as a valuable source of autologous bone graft for the treatment of large bone defects of different nature. In this article, we present two cases of complex femoral nonunions treated with the use of the RIA System. A review of the published literature on the treatment of femoral nonunions with RIA was also performed. Core tip: In case of atrophic nonunions, the RIA System can be used to obtain biologically active tissue to enhance bone healing. Despite the absence of high-quality studies focused on femoral nonunions, the efficacy of RIA is well-known and orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of this powerful tool.

Purpose This article compares short-term outcomes of two series of patients, who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with two different implants, both based on Grammont's principles: the Delta III (D-3) and the Delta Xtend (D-XT) prostheses. Methods The D-3 group included a consecutive series of 26 patients (mean age 75 years), that were treated between 2000 and 2006; the D-XT group included a consecutive series of 31 patients (mean age 72.5 years), for a total of 33 implants performed between 2011 and 2015. In both groups the most common diagnoses were cuff tear arthropathy (18 and 22 shoulders, respectively) and malunion of proximal humerus fractures (3 and 5). All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. Constant–Murley score (CMS) was used to assess clinical and functional outcomes. Radiographic evaluation included the true anteroposterior and axillary views. Results Twenty-three patients of the D-3 group and 22 patients (24 shoulders) of the D-XT group were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 42 months (range 26–84) and 44 months (range 26–66), respectively. Four complications occurred in the D-3 group (1 partial deltoid detachment, 1 dislocation, and 2 glenoid component loosening), while one early postoperative infection occurred in the D-XT group. Increases in elevation and CMS between preoperative and postoperative period were observed in both groups; only the D-XT group showed a slight improvement in rotations. The incidence of scapular notching was significantly different between the two groups: 100% for D-3 and 22.2% for D-XT in patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Conclusion Prosthetic design evolution and greater acquaintance with this surgery have undoubtedly led to an improvement in short-term outcomes with second generation implants of RTSA. Future studies will have to ascertain whether newer implants, relying on biomechanical solutions alternative to Grammont's original concept, might provide additional advantages and minimize drawbacks.